Search for: "HOPE v. WALKER"
Results 261 - 280
of 427
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Aug 2011, 3:47 am
Take State v. [read post]
12 Aug 2011, 5:19 pm
Walker v. [read post]
12 Aug 2011, 8:58 am
Judgment The Supreme Court (Lord Hope, Lord Walker, Lord Collins, Lord Clarke and Lord Wilson) unanimously concluded that the employment tribunal was entitled to decide that the documents did not reflect the true agreement between the parties. [read post]
8 Aug 2011, 12:22 pm
Reading: Rosenberg, The Hollow Hope, xi-36. [read post]
4 Aug 2011, 3:27 pm
The US Supreme Court ruled in the case of Graham v. [read post]
27 Jul 2011, 2:58 am
In its 39-page ruling (in full here), Lords Walker and Collins say: "47. [read post]
17 Jul 2011, 9:55 am
There are two appeals in the Supreme Court beginning with Human Genome Sciences Inc v Eli Lilly and Company to be heard on Monday 18 to Wednesday 20 July 2011 by Lords Hope, Walker, Neuberger, Collins and Clarke. [read post]
13 Jul 2011, 7:54 am
The Supreme Court hearing is to take place on Wednesday 13 and Thursday 14 July 2011 and will be heard by Lord Hope, Lord Walker, Lady Hale, Lord Collins of Mapesbury and Lord Clarke. [read post]
10 Jul 2011, 2:02 pm
The second appeal in the Supreme Court this week is In the matter of Kaupthing Singer and Friedlander Limited (in administration) and In the matter of the Insolvency Act 1986 which is to be heard on Wednesday 13 and Thursday 14 July 2011 by Lord Hope, Lord Walker, Lady Hale, Lord Collins of Mapesbury and Lord Clarke. [read post]
8 Jul 2011, 5:02 am
Lord Hope also indicated that he would have considered the potential for an appeal to the Upper Tribunal curative of any breach of Article 6, following Albert and Le Compte v Belgium (1983) 5 EHRR 533, para 29; Tehrani v United Kingdom Central Council for Nursing, Midwifery and Health Visiting [2001] IRLR 208; R (Thompson) v Law Society [2004] 1 WLR 2522 There is one curiosity in the reasoning of Lord Dyson in that he seeks to dismiss concerns that the ISA does… [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 11:29 am
In a two day hearing starting tomorrow before Lords Hope, Walker, Clarke, Mance and Wilson, the Supreme Court will hear these conjoined appeals, which are both brought by taxpayers who are seeking to challenging HMRC’s decision to treat them as UK resident for tax purposes. [read post]
3 Jul 2011, 4:12 am
This week, the Supreme Court will consider the linked appeals of R (Davies & Anor) v The Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs and R (Gaines-Cooper) v The Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs which are to be heard on Wednesday 6 and Thursday 7 July 2011 by Lords Hope, Walker, Mance, Clarke and Wilson. [read post]
30 Jun 2011, 8:27 am
If he doesn’t like being approachedin the door jamb, step back into the hall.TORVIK: Well, I hope we can agree that assigning fault – other thanthe "a pox on both their houses" conclusion – depends on tiny littledetails that we don't have (which has always been Althouse's point, by theway). [read post]
26 Jun 2011, 11:27 am
The appeals in Her Majesty’s Advocate v Ambrose, Her Majesty’s Advocate v G, Her Majesty’s Advocate v M and Her Majesty’s Advocate v P will be heard over three days commencing on Tuesday 28 June 2011 by Lords Hope, Brown, Kerr, Dyson and Clarke (Scotland). [read post]
26 Jun 2011, 9:34 am
United States v. [read post]
17 Jun 2011, 8:10 am
I hope this week gets even more exciting! [read post]
13 Jun 2011, 10:30 am
Walker In Santa Monica Baykeeper v. [read post]
12 Jun 2011, 12:59 pm
The three-day appeal in the case of AXA General Insurance Ltd v The Lord Advocate (Scotland) will commence on Monday 13 June 2011 and will be heard by Lords Hope, Brown, Mance, Kerr, Clarke, Dyson and Reed. [read post]
10 Jun 2011, 8:45 am
Breaches of policy which directly bear upon detention vitiate authority for detention and sound in false imprisonment without more (even where the breach is procedural). 2.The test is material public law error (Lumba per Lord Dyson at §68; Kambadzi per Lord Hope at §§41-42; Lady Hale at §69, Lord Kerr at §88), not abuse of power in so far as that latter phrase denotes a more stringent test (per Lord Walker at §193 in… [read post]
3 Jun 2011, 5:34 am
The most significant factor for the Court, which was referred to by both Lord Walker, giving the leading judgment, and Lord Hope concurring, appears to be that 75% of the funds paid by the LLP for the licence of software rights did not go to MCashback (even temporarily) but instead were immediately passed back by way of a chain of banks to the lender. [read post]
