Search for: "HOUSE v. TENNESSEE" Results 261 - 280 of 731
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Jul 2018, 9:26 am by Venkat Balasubramani
The son used the hoverboard and left it in the house and it caught on fire, destroying the house. [read post]
3 Jul 2018, 6:59 am by Edith Roberts
Court of Appeals for the 6th Circuit, which covers Ohio, Michigan, Kentucky and Tennessee. [read post]
26 Jun 2018, 7:37 am by Kevin Kaufman
Supreme Court handed down its decision in South Dakota v. [read post]
18 Jun 2018, 8:29 am by J. Ross Pepper
” For a case in which an opposite result was reached, take a look at Ewell v. [read post]
18 Jun 2018, 8:29 am by J. Ross Pepper
” For a case in which an opposite result was reached, take a look at Ewell v. [read post]
17 Jun 2018, 12:27 pm by Howard Friedman
LEXIS 97658 (MD TN, June 11, 2018), a Tennessee federal district court, in a prisoner suit primarily focusing on other issues, held that an inmate can move ahead with his complaint that prisoners are not allowed to attend any religious services while housed in the RCA pod.In Hargrove v. [read post]
2 Jun 2018, 4:54 am by Chris Seaton
On April 19, 2018, the Tennessee Senate and House of Representatives approved the budget. [read post]
23 Apr 2018, 11:08 am by Kent Scheidegger
  If they were, in fact, houses, it should not matter that Tennessee also punishes burglary of trailers, even if that act is not considered "generic burglary" for federal purposes. [read post]
23 Apr 2018, 8:28 am by Dan Carvajal
Key Findings Property tax limitations have been adopted in forty-six states and the District of Columbia, though their designs and restrictiveness differ widely. [read post]
16 Apr 2018, 12:10 pm by Liisa Speaker
In addition, the Court noted the potential unlicensed practice of law issue is for the Tennessee Bar to address – not the judiciary. [read post]
9 Apr 2018, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
LEXIS 58362 (MD TN, April 5, 2018), a Tennessee federal district court held that inmates have not alleged a substantial burden on free exercise by alleging that during religious services in their housing pod the television is on at high volume and inmates not attending the service are out of their cells talking loudly.In Larry v. [read post]