Search for: "Hales v. Hales"
Results 261 - 280
of 1,469
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Dec 2010, 9:05 am
Kowaleski v. [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 3:41 am
With reference to Eweida v United Kingdom (2013) 57 EHRR 213, Lady Hale accepted that refusing for religious reasons to perform some aspects of a j [read post]
5 Mar 2014, 2:11 am
Lady Hale considered it disturbing that the Convention excludes damages claims for breaches of individuals’ fundamental rights, and the parties to the Convention should address the grave injustice done to those in the appellant’s position. [read post]
29 Oct 2012, 5:14 pm
U.S. v. [read post]
29 Nov 2009, 10:29 am
/**/ R (A) v Croydon & R (M) v Lambeth UKSC [2009] 8 This was an appeal heard by the House of Lords over the course of four days in July, but with judgment delivered by the new Supreme Court. [read post]
29 Nov 2009, 10:29 am
/**/ R (A) v Croydon & R (M) v Lambeth UKSC [2009] 8 This was an appeal heard by the House of Lords over the course of four days in July, but with judgment delivered by the new Supreme Court. [read post]
1 Feb 2011, 3:53 am
OMH, Lambert claimed, (1) found her to be her eligible for FMLA benefits on February 1995 but (2) terminated her in March 1995.The court never reached the merits of Lambert’s allegations, holding that [s]ince Lambert’s FMLA claim against the Office of Mental Health is predicated on a request for leave involving her own health condition (in contrast, for example, to a request for leave for the birth of a child), it is barred by the Eleventh Amendment.The court cited Hale… [read post]
11 Nov 2013, 1:18 am
The post Case Preview: Richardson & Anor v DPP appeared first on UKSC blog. [read post]
5 May 2011, 5:05 am
Lord Phillips and Lady Hale, considered similar questions in relation to the meaning of ‘benefit’ in confiscation cases (albeit in relation to the preceding statutory regime under Criminal Justice Act 1988) relatively recently as Law Lords in CPS v Jennings [2008] UKHL 29. [read post]
16 Dec 2008, 1:31 pm
Power Co. v. [read post]
15 Jun 2016, 2:26 am
Lord Neuberger and Lady Hale also stated that even if the court had been able to find the possession order disproportionate to her rights under art 8, the appellant could not assume that this would have led to the order being refused. [read post]
24 Feb 2016, 2:22 am
The trial judge held that he was bound to follow the approach adopted by the House of Lords in the cases of Cookson v Knowles [1979] AC 556 and Graham v Dodds [1983] 1 WLR 808 and to calculate the multiplier from the date of death. [read post]
15 Dec 2016, 2:30 pm
The case is Parker et al. v. [read post]
15 Dec 2016, 2:30 pm
The case is Parker et al. v. [read post]
27 Nov 2013, 2:41 pm
In Bull v. [read post]
2 Apr 2018, 10:41 am
In Hale v. [read post]
25 Jun 2024, 4:05 am
Supreme Court yesterday granted review in Republic of Hungary v. [read post]
23 Apr 2008, 1:22 pm
This was a deliberate policy choice to make the law respond to current needs: see per Baroness Hale at [60]. [read post]
14 Jul 2010, 2:49 pm
The National Law Journal features the Smith v. [read post]
15 Jun 2012, 3:35 am
On 14 March 2012, the Supreme Court handed down their long-awaited judgment in the case of AB v Ministry of Defence, the much publicised case of the former British servicemen seeking compensation from the British government following alleged exposure to radiation nuclear testing that took place in the Pacific region from 1952 to 1958. [read post]
