Search for: "Hall v. State Bar"
Results 261 - 280
of 875
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Dec 2017, 1:46 pm
Brainchild: Loving v. [read post]
28 Dec 2017, 5:37 am
The other was developed for (and is only available to) the staff, volunteers, and visitors of the Elder Justice & Civil Resource Center, located in City Hall, with whom Jenkins partnered this year. [read post]
10 Dec 2017, 9:43 am
Hall stated that he received the trial notice on September 14, 2015, from Stewart via e-mail.[1]On February 2, 2016, the trial court heard the motion for new trial; Hall appeared for Gonzales, and a lawyer from Lubbock, Joseph Aguilar, also appeared.[2] At the hearing, Hall objected to the affidavit of Staley, Midland Funding's lead counsel, because it was conclusory. [read post]
10 Dec 2017, 9:43 am
Hall stated that he received the trial notice on September 14, 2015, from Stewart via e-mail.[1]On February 2, 2016, the trial court heard the motion for new trial; Hall appeared for Gonzales, and a lawyer from Lubbock, Joseph Aguilar, also appeared.[2] At the hearing, Hall objected to the affidavit of Staley, Midland Funding's lead counsel, because it was conclusory. [read post]
30 Nov 2017, 12:16 pm
The case is Knight First Amendment Institute v. [read post]
28 Nov 2017, 12:14 pm
The petitioners in that case, Elane Photography v. [read post]
6 Nov 2017, 6:03 pm
BancorpSouth v. [read post]
3 Oct 2017, 4:00 am
In this way, LSUC embellishes its appearance of an adequate response to the problem, but those young people do not gain what only a law society-sponsored solution to the problem can give them, which is a financially adequate and stable career, with a high probability of an adequate return on the large investment necessary to obtain a law degree and “call to the bar. [read post]
26 Sep 2017, 4:00 am
In 2003, LegalZoom received a “cease and desist” order from the North Carolina State Bar on the basis that its non-licensed “legal technicians” were actively involved in document review and preparation.[12] The Missouri Federal Court later upheld the order on a motion for summary judgment, agreeing that LegalZoom’s platform went beyond a “do-it-yourself” service and crossed the boundary of unauthorized practice.[13] The result of the… [read post]
11 Sep 2017, 8:59 am
The post Wedding cakes v. religious beliefs? [read post]
10 Sep 2017, 3:07 pm
Accordingly, Winne's MUTPA claims against Citizens and PNC will be dismissed.Turning to Winne's TILA claims, the banks argue that the claims are barred by the statute of limita [read post]
8 Sep 2017, 5:05 am
Meanwhile, national coalitions have swarmed statehouses and city halls. [read post]
1 Sep 2017, 6:49 am
JESSICA PARKER VALENTINE AND BRYAN L. [read post]
25 Aug 2017, 4:00 am
If law societies won’t try, other sources should not be barred by such law society prosecutions. [read post]
24 Aug 2017, 4:43 am
The defendants Putney Twombly Hall & Hirson, LLP, William M. [read post]
11 Aug 2017, 9:09 am
In 1881, the United States Supreme Court ruled in Egbert v. [read post]
29 Jun 2017, 8:30 am
He was counsel of record for the 30 amicus states in Davila v. [read post]
27 Jun 2017, 11:52 am
Mental-health professionals ascended from the footnotes to the body of the opinion in Hall v. [read post]
26 Jun 2017, 4:17 pm
The justices declined to take up the case of Peruta v. [read post]
16 Jun 2017, 12:50 pm
TUESDAY Paper Session: Comparative History of Legal Cultures (Private Law)Tue, 6/20: 10:00 AM - 11:45 AM – Sheraton Maria Isabel Sala 455, Danubio Tower (4th Floor) · Chair—Andrés Botero Bernal, Industrial University of Santander · Discussant—Dong Jiang, Renmin University of China · A Comparison of… [read post]
