Search for: "Harbour v. Harbour"
Results 261 - 280
of 429
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Feb 2017, 1:21 am
Readers with a fancy for online IP enforcement will remember that last July the Court of Appeal of England and Wales issued its decision in Cartier and Others v BSkyB and Others [here], in which it upheld the 2014 decision of Arnold J in the High Court [here and here] that blocking injunctions are also available in trade mark cases under the general power recognised by s37(1) of the Senior Courts Act 1981 (SCA). [read post]
29 Mar 2011, 1:37 am
SourcesFirst instance ruling in Roadshow Films Pty Ltd v iiNet Ltd [2010] FCA 24 (4 February 2010) hereAppeal decision in Roadshow Films Pty Ltd v iiNet Ltd [2011] FCAFC 23 (24 February 2011) here [read post]
21 Feb 2010, 7:15 pm
., Kalem Co. v. [read post]
30 Jan 2008, 4:03 pm
The yacht and the Leonards ended up in Lisbon harbour, where the yacht, and the Leonards stayed. [read post]
24 Mar 2019, 3:26 pm
Technetix B.V. v Teleste Limited".OtherThe AmeriKat provides another FRANDly update, covering HTC v Ericsson, European Parliament SEP analysis, and more! [read post]
16 Feb 2018, 12:45 am
No, says the European Court of Human Rights | BMG v Cox - when does an ISP lose its safe harbour protection? [read post]
7 Dec 2014, 3:29 pm
This ruling (and the analysis provided in this post, written by me) defines a new generation of hosting providers held eligible to benefit of the E-Commerce Directive safe harbour. [read post]
16 Jun 2019, 11:07 am
DesignsRosie Burbidge published her last post as an official GuestKat, providing a tour of some recent design decisions, including Tynan v J4K Sports Ltd [2018] EWHC 3519 and Pulseon OY v Garmin (Europe) Ltd [2019] EWCA Civ 138. [read post]
12 Mar 2019, 4:00 am
Co. v Maryland Cas. [read post]
15 Jul 2020, 10:07 am
All companies involved in the PRISM program appeared to be Safe Harbour-certified, making the Safe Harbour scheme, in words of the EU Commission, “one of the conduits through which access is given to US intelligence authorities to collecting personal data initially processed in the EU”. [read post]
24 May 2019, 8:38 am
, Inc v Jen, Chi [2019] SGIPOS 3. [read post]
13 Jun 2019, 1:06 pm
Observations on Geography while Waiting for G2/19 | AIPPI Event Report: Actavis v ICOS Supreme Court Rapid Response | Paul Rawlinson (1962-2019) | Retromark Volume V: the last six months in trade marks | BREAKING: Council adopts DSM Directive | USPTO find two male torso-shaped perfume bottles confusingly similar | Guitar headstock not distinctive for … guitars, says EUIPO Board of Appeal | Conference report - More than Just a Game | What is bad faith? [read post]
15 Feb 2014, 3:31 am
In 1997 the DMCA enacted a system of safe harbours for intermediaries which allowed them to have limited immunity for things like hosting, caching and transfer of content; all of these also exist in the European equivalent created by Arts 12-14 of the E-commerce Directive. [read post]
13 Jun 2022, 12:39 am
On 9 June 2022, the trial of preliminary issues in the case of The Duke of Sussex v Associated Newspapers was held before Nicklin J. [read post]
2 Nov 2015, 1:51 am
The Information Commissioner’s Blog suggests that the next few months will be critical with regard to Safe Harbour. [read post]
[Guest post] “Quevedo Port” for olive oil does not infringe PDO “Porto/Port”, rules EU General Court
6 Mar 2025, 11:04 am
The decision highlighted that the average consumer cannot help but think of Champagne when confronted with a sign beginning with “Champagn-”.However, the word “Port” does not only refer to the wine of the same name, but it might also be associated with the idea of a “harbour”. [read post]
9 Jun 2016, 2:11 am
* Ninth Circuit Finds De Minimis Sampling of Sound Recordings Non-Infringing The Ninth Circuit has rejected the 2005 Bridgeport Music Inc. v. [read post]
26 Mar 2016, 4:58 am
As Elonora tell us over on the IPKat, the answer is unsurprisingly yes - and the use is not protected by the doctrine of fair use nor by 'safe harbour' - confirmed by Arnold J in his 174-paragraph judgment in England And Wales Cricket Board Ltd & Another v Tixdaq Ltd & Another [2016] EWHC 575 (Ch).The German head of digital-economy policy at the European Commission, Günther Oettinger, is considering rolling out German and Spanish… [read post]
4 Jul 2016, 12:15 am
C-567/14 | Life as an IP Lawyer: Dusseldorf, Germany | ISP's delay in removing content can remove safe harbour | Avengers: when is confusion not confusion? [read post]
17 Sep 2018, 2:27 am
This awarded was topped by the Supreme Court of Queensland which, in the case of Wagner v Harbour Radio ([2018] QSC 201) awarded a record total of $3.7 million to four brothers over defamatory radio broadcasts. [read post]
