Search for: "Harder v. State" Results 261 - 280 of 3,474
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Jan 2023, 12:34 am by Orin S. Kerr
  It starts with a case on the open fields doctrine, United States v. [read post]
The summer of our discontents Two months ago, if you prompted Version 3 of the AI-art generator MidJourney to generate depictions of an “otter on a plane using wifi,” you were rewarded with the nonsense in the left panel of our lead graphic. [read post]
27 Dec 2022, 9:42 pm by Ilya Somin
Ct. at 1012, "especially weighing the factor[] of time elapsed since the inception of the suit," Smoke v. [read post]
20 Dec 2022, 9:39 pm by Florian Mueller
The United States Congress has practically concluded its 117th term without passing the Open App Markets Act (OAMA) into law. [read post]
14 Dec 2022, 5:00 am by Unknown
Those benefits would be different with different types of reform, but they might be profound, potentially including the reversal of Dobbs v. [read post]
13 Dec 2022, 6:52 pm by Kurt R. Karst
  FDA has in fact asserted this position in the past: CRL v. [read post]
29 Nov 2022, 5:01 am by Scott R. Anderson
These efforts ended after the U.S. withdrawal in 2011 but were revived in 2014 when the Obama administration once again intervened in Iraq to lead a military campaign against the Islamic State in Iraq and the Levant (ISIL) terrorist group. [read post]
20 Nov 2022, 11:03 pm by Peter Mahler
Chernomordik v Ocean Sand Development, LLC, decided earlier this month by Brooklyn Commercial Division Justice Leon Ruchelsman, presents one of the more intriguing examples of a dissolution case highlighting the centrality of the purpose clause in a realty holding LLC’s operating agreement. [read post]
17 Nov 2022, 4:00 am by Guest Author
EPA and more in the concerns animating Justice Jackson’s concurrence in Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. [read post]
15 Nov 2022, 4:00 am by Michael C. Dorf
Today's essay will focus on the second point, harnessing evidence from an order the Court issued yesterday in Ward v. [read post]