Search for: "Harmon v. Givens" Results 261 - 280 of 464
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Dec 2019, 10:43 am by Rebecca Tushnet
We need to balance what’s given and taken away. [read post]
7 Apr 2023, 7:48 am by Rebecca Tushnet
A: given the transparency requirements, the audit report should be able to provide more insights, but we don’t know for sure yet. [read post]
7 Mar 2012, 12:12 pm by Veronika Gaertner
The program of harmonization and unification of conflicts of laws (“Rome I”–“Rome V” and more) obliges to describe the scope of each regulation. [read post]
17 Jan 2019, 7:58 pm by MOTP
Given the uncertainty, three vehicles were invoked by the same party to get into the court of appeals for a second opinion: (1) Notice of regular appeal, should the order compelling multi-party arbitration be deemed final; (2) notice of interlocutory (accelerated) appeal otherwise; and (3) petition for mandamus, in case appellate jurisdiction was found to be lacking. [read post]
23 Mar 2015, 7:31 am by Venkat Balasubramani
No case law supports such a contention. __ Given a seeming split in Washington courts, this case is a possible candidate for review by the Washington State Supreme Court. [read post]
25 Feb 2010, 4:43 am
(2) Should our national and international law making force further EU harmonization over and beyond what has already occurred? [read post]