Search for: "Harris v. Holder"
Results 261 - 280
of 330
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Jan 2020, 4:24 pm
Data Privacy and Data Protection The Press Gazette had a piece “Why Harry and Megan are better equipped to protect their privacy in England then Canada”. [read post]
30 Dec 2018, 3:03 am
Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit in Folkens v Wyland. [read post]
23 Aug 2008, 1:23 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: DRM for streaming music dies a quiet death: (Electronic Frontier Foundation), (Techdirt) CAFC decides Apotex and Impax infringed AstraZeneca’s Prilosec patents: (Law360), (Patent Prospector), (Patent Docs), (GenericsWeb), CAFC upholds lower court’s decision finding USPTO was within its rights to subject a Cooper patent to… [read post]
14 Feb 2014, 9:35 am
Rehnquist (who clerked for Justice Jackson), to the ruling in National Federation of Independent Business v. [read post]
4 Nov 2020, 10:06 am
By Colleen V. [read post]
24 Jul 2009, 12:19 am
In Blanch v. [read post]
28 Apr 2008, 11:00 am
: (Patent Docs), US: Supreme Court declines to hear final Nucleonics’ appeal in gene-silencing patent dispute with Benitec Australia: (IP Law360), (Therapeutics Daily), US: 505(b)(2) drug approvals rock - Interaction of patents and exclusivity of drugs approved by FDA under section 505(b)(2): (Patent Baristas), US: StemCells’ patents survive reexam – StemCells and Neuralstem differ on extent of changes: (Patent Docs), US: StemCells announces issuance of… [read post]
18 Oct 2018, 10:42 am
Tingy (1800), Little v. [read post]
4 Sep 2014, 12:58 pm
Russian President Vladimir V. [read post]
31 Jan 2011, 9:12 pm
Tokai v. [read post]
24 Jan 2020, 1:00 am
District Court for the Southern District of New York, defendants have introduced two new ways to rebut Basic Inc. v. [read post]
16 Feb 2024, 12:13 pm
Then, in Lexmark v. [read post]
29 Aug 2008, 1:25 pm
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: CAFC sets strict standards to establish inequitable conduct: Star Scientific v R J Reynolds Tobacco: (Hal Wegner), (Maryland Intellectual Property Law Blog), (Patent Prospector), (Patent Docs), (Patently-O), (more from Patently-O), (Philip Brooks), (Law360), (I/P Updates), Safe harbour ruling in Io v Veoh could help YouTube in Viacom… [read post]
13 Sep 2023, 5:56 am
But many have criticized the report for downplaying the harried nature of OAR/OAW. [read post]
23 May 2017, 1:43 pm
Harris will certainly not provide it. [read post]
20 Apr 2013, 7:00 am
The Supreme Court released its decision on the centuries-old Alien Tort Statute (ATS) in Kiobel v. [read post]
8 Dec 2015, 2:41 pm
Holder – no state or local government is currently required to obtain preclearance at all. [read post]
14 Sep 2014, 9:01 pm
In Harris v. [read post]
17 Aug 2020, 12:00 pm
After the Supreme Court’s decision in Shelby County v. [read post]
