Search for: "He, et al v. Holder"
Results 261 - 280
of 412
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Jan 2011, 12:01 am
In Milavetz, Gallop & Milavetz, P.A., et al. v. [read post]
23 Dec 2010, 12:27 pm
Miesch, et al., No. 05-1076 (DB). [read post]
6 Jun 2023, 8:32 am
The test in Committee for Justice and Liberty et al v. [read post]
3 Nov 2014, 5:22 am
The fair use provision was used as an affirmative defense in litigation concerning the HathiTrust et al., and after much time and money spent in litigation, the court ruled, and the appeals court ruled, that HathiTrusts’s activity could be considered fair. [read post]
29 May 2018, 7:23 am
Davies, Sebaly Shillito + Dyer LPA, Dayton, for Petitioners Cynthia Boyd et al. [read post]
5 Jan 2014, 3:30 pm
Examples are US v. [read post]
1 Oct 2010, 8:56 am
PRS Media Partners, LLC, et. al. [read post]
17 Jun 2022, 9:07 pm
Decided on June 16, 2022 No. 55 [*1]In the Matter of DCH Auto, & c. et al., Appellants, vTown of Mamaroneck, & c., et al., Respondents. [read post]
17 Jun 2022, 9:07 pm
Decided on June 16, 2022 No. 55 [*1]In the Matter of DCH Auto, & c. et al., Appellants, vTown of Mamaroneck, & c., et al., Respondents. [read post]
16 Feb 2011, 6:24 am
And finally, no mention was made of the 2009 Certificate of Relief From Disabilities which Caputo had received from his sentencing judge in 2009....Interestingly, counsel first argues that the United States Supreme Court’s recent interpretation of the Second Amendment to the United States Constitution in two cases, District of Columbia, et al. v. [read post]
22 Sep 2008, 6:06 pm
[t]he owner or holder of the lien fails to file an action to foreclose the lien in the county where the property is located not later than thirty (30) days after receiving the notice. [read post]
24 Mar 2017, 7:24 am
Indiana Public Retirement System, et al., 16-581? [read post]
10 Jun 2013, 11:38 am
James Sensenbrenner et al., who filed an amicus brief in support of the respondent in this case.Issue: Whether Congress’ decision in 2006 to reauthorize Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act under the pre-existing coverage formula of Section 4(b) of the Voting Rights Act exceeded its authority under the Fourteenth and Fifteenth Amendments and thus violated the Tenth Amendment and Article IV of the United States Constitution. [read post]
7 Dec 2015, 4:00 am
(See for example, MDG Computers Canada Inc. et al. v. [read post]
28 Oct 2009, 8:41 pm
Cioffi, et al., Case No. 08-CR-415 (FB) (E.D.N.Y.; Oct. 26, 2009).) [read post]
19 Feb 2010, 12:32 pm
In fact, it’s fair to view Function Media v. [read post]
7 Nov 2011, 9:36 am
The case is Knox, et al., v. [read post]
28 Mar 2013, 2:23 pm
Directors may be removed at any time by the votes, cast to that effect by the holders of the majority of the subscribed shares with a voting right in the elections of directors. [read post]
10 Apr 2015, 4:26 pm
See David Yurman Enterprises LLC et al v. [read post]
