Search for: "He v. Holder" Results 261 - 280 of 5,717
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Aug 2023, 2:08 am by Frank Cranmer
The protection afforded to clergy office-holders by EU Directives was provided by s.49 of that Act. [read post]
7 Apr 2022, 10:36 am by Eugene Volokh
The post "Do Copyright Holders Get a Free Pass to Identify Alleged Infringers? [read post]
31 May 2021, 7:51 pm by Peter Mahler
The New York Court of Appeals’ 2012 opinion in Pappas v Tzolis, decided in the wake and spirit of that court’s rulings the year before in the Centro Empresarial v America Movil and Arfa v Zamir cases, raised the bar for claims of fraud and breach of fiduciary duty brought by non-controlling shareholders and LLC members in connection with buyout transactions. [read post]
2 Dec 2014, 4:00 am by Patricia Salkin
Dembiee v Town of Holderness, 2014 WL 5859514 (NH 11/13/2014) The opinion can be accessed at: http://law.justia.com/cases/new-hampshire/supreme-court/2014/2013-068.htmlFiled under: Current Caselaw, Declaratory Relief, Enforcement, Estoppel, Ripeness [read post]
2 Dec 2014, 4:00 am by Patricia Salkin
Dembiee v Town of Holderness, 2014 WL 5859514 (NH 11/13/2014) The opinion can be accessed at: http://law.justia.com/cases/new-hampshire/supreme-court/2014/2013-068.htmlFiled under: Current Caselaw, Declaratory Relief, Enforcement, Estoppel, Ripeness [read post]
7 Sep 2012, 1:16 am by Blog  Editorial
 Dermod O’Brien QC, who sat as a Crown Court Recorder for 27 years, challenged the decision by the Ministry of Justice not to grant him a judicial pension on his retirement because he was a part-time judicial office holder paid a daily fee. [read post]
8 Feb 2014, 6:37 pm by Lyle Denniston
This effort, he told a dinner gathering of the Human Rights Campaign, a gay rights advocacy group, is intended “to give real meaning” to the Supreme Court’s decision last June in United States v. [read post]
14 Apr 2011, 2:15 am by sally
Staatssecretaris van Financiën v Sony Supply Chain Solutions (Europe) BV, formerly Sony Logistics Europe BV (Case C-153/10); [2011] WLR (D) 130 “A person who made customs declarations in his own name and on his own behalf could not rely on a binding tariff information of which he was not the holder, but which associated company on whose instructions he made those declarations. [read post]
9 May 2012, 9:59 am by Jonathan H. Adler
Holder because the decision was based, in part, on erroneous factual premises. [read post]