Search for: "Head v. Walker" Results 261 - 280 of 345
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Jan 2011, 3:35 am by Kelly
Clair Intellectual Property Consultants v Canon (Patents Post Grant Blog) District Court C D California: Microsoft Word does not infringe patent claiming user interface that is ‘continuously responsive to user input’ even though the accused interface ‘from the user’s standpoint… remains continuously responsive’: Walker Digital, LLC v. [read post]
13 Jan 2011, 10:28 am by Kent Scheidegger
  It presents an issue related to the one in the pending case of Walker v. [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 12:53 am by chief
For more detail you could do little better than head over to A royale quarterpounder, our post on Kay v UK, and you may also want to consider Nic Madge's take, not least as I've borrowed the inspiration for this subheading from him. [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 12:53 am by chief
For more detail you could do little better than head over to A royale quarterpounder, our post on Kay v UK, and you may also want to consider Nic Madge's take, not least as I've borrowed the inspiration for this subheading from him. [read post]
19 Sep 2010, 5:36 pm by INFORRM
In the case of Police v Slater (14 September 2010) the District Court in Auckland found that Whale Oil had been in breach of name suppression orders made by the Court. [read post]
13 Sep 2010, 6:07 pm by Keith Kanouse
While there is no decision, of which we are aware, specifically holding that the typical renewal provision is unenforceable, or that a franchisor that refuses to collectively negotiate the terms of a renewal franchise agreement violates the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing, recent cases in favor of franchisees are heading in that direction. [read post]
6 Sep 2010, 1:06 am by INFORRM
Hamptons International Dubai LLC & anr v Royal Institution of Chartered Surveyors heard 23 July 2010 (Eady J) Spiller v Joseph heard 26 and 27 July 2010 (Lords Phillips, Rodger, Walker and Brown and Sir John Dyson) BBC v HarperCollins, heard 31 August and 1 September 2010 (Morgan J) [read post]
22 Aug 2010, 9:20 pm by Steve Bainbridge
At least Breaston isn't a head case, a dropper, or on suspension. 14 [read post]
17 Aug 2010, 2:14 pm
And it is worth noting that in any such suit, the Eleventh Amendment could rear its head -- it was not even raised or discussed in Judge Walker's opinion, because the County officials involved were interested in collusion, not confrontation.The Eleventh Amendment bars suits in federal courts against any State without its consent. [read post]
9 Aug 2010, 11:50 am by Westminster Law Library
On August 4, 2010, the decision was reached in Perry et al v. [read post]
6 Aug 2010, 9:30 am by Stevie E. Leahy
 Read on, and form your own opinion. * “FF”  refers to “Finding of Fact” in the Perry v. [read post]
22 Jul 2010, 11:30 am by Jonathan Bailey
It’s common for reviewers and their subjects to butt heads over copyright issues. [read post]