Search for: "Hernandez v. New York"
Results 261 - 280
of 310
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Dec 2008, 7:16 pm
The argument is illogical on its face, but has been accepted by quite a few state courts, including -- to the utter shame ofmy home state -- the abysmally reasoned decision by the New York Court of Appeals from two years ago. [read post]
4 Dec 2008, 9:34 am
Moreover, while the Court of Appeals - the State's highest court - held in Hernandez v. [read post]
1 Dec 2008, 11:45 am
State v. [read post]
7 Oct 2008, 12:38 pm
Second, the New York State Court of Appeals has held to enforce the preemption of Vehicle and Traffic Law § 388 by the Graves Amendment (see Graham v Duckley, supra; Johnson v Kling, 854 NYS2d 648 [2 Dept 20081, reversed on other grounds, 10 NY3d 887 [2008]; Hernandez v Sanchez, 836 NYS2d 577 [1 Dept 2007]; Kuryla w Halabi, 835 NYS2d 230 [2 Dept 2007]; Jones v Bill, 825 NYS2d 508 [2 Dept 20063, reversed on other grounds, 10… [read post]
7 Oct 2008, 1:50 am
As had the 4th Department, the Beth R. court found that the New York Court of Appeals' decision in Hernandez v. [read post]
25 Sep 2008, 11:05 am
" In the Shepard v Ward, 547 NYS2d 57, the Appellate said that suspicious behavior coupled with anonymous tips provided a basis for reasonable suspicion.In Board of Educ. of City School Dist. of City of New York v. [read post]
17 Sep 2008, 11:53 am
Row V! [read post]
2 Sep 2008, 9:34 pm
They relied heavily on a 2006 decision by the state's highest court, Hernandez v. [read post]
9 Aug 2008, 1:50 am
Here is IP Think Tank’s weekly selection of top intellectual property news breaking in the blogosphere and internet. [read post]
4 Jun 2008, 2:20 pm
The conservative upstate court, whose judges were elected by voters in Western New York and four of whom were appointed to the Appellate Division by Governor George Pataki, concluded that the 2006 decision by New York's highest court, Hernandez v. [read post]
3 Jun 2008, 2:28 pm
The 4th Department, which decided the Martinez case, is among the most conservative of the four appellate departments and produced a unanimous decision by judges elected in Western and Central New York, not in New York City. [read post]
31 May 2008, 8:11 pm
Robles, which ruled that same-sex couples are entitled to marry in New York. [read post]
15 Apr 2008, 12:30 am
LEXIS 27686 (WD NY, March 31, 2008), a New York federal district court rejected claims by plaintiff that her Free Exercise rights were violated while she was held as a pre-trial detainee. [read post]
28 Mar 2008, 2:44 pm
The trial judge, ruling shortly after the New York Court of Appeals' decision in Hernandez v. [read post]
20 Mar 2008, 4:48 am
Dretke (2005) on the one hand from Hernandez v. [read post]
6 Mar 2008, 12:56 pm
New York State Department of Civil Service. [read post]
25 Feb 2008, 3:38 pm
Hernandez v. [read post]
8 Feb 2008, 9:39 am
The case is Martinez v. [read post]
7 Feb 2008, 10:46 am
In a brave, new preemption world, such things might amount to breaches in the dike preventing liability. [read post]
1 Feb 2008, 3:25 pm
Instead, Peradotto takes on the other main stumbling block, the Court of Appeals' 2006 decision in Hernandez v. [read post]
