Search for: "Hills v. Georgia" Results 261 - 280 of 411
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Nov 2012, 9:00 pm
For instance, for a roadblock to be legal in Georgia it must be “implemented by supervisory personnel at the programmatic level with a legitimate primary purpose,” Thomas v. [read post]
29 Aug 2012, 2:31 am by tekEditor
Bill BuxtonMicrosoft ResearchOriginal: Jan. 12, 2007Version:  March 2, 2012 Keywords / Search Terms Multi-touch, multitouch, input, interaction, touch screen, touch tablet, multi-finger input, multi-hand input, bi-manual input, two-handed input, multi-person input, interactive surfaces, soft machine, hand gesture, gesture recognition . [read post]
27 Jul 2012, 10:54 am by Steve Hall
Supreme Court 2007 ruling in  Panetti v. [read post]
23 Jul 2012, 10:27 am by Steve Hall
Georgia inspired a national movement to protect the intellectually disabled from execution, culminating in Atkins v. [read post]
21 Jul 2012, 8:47 am by Ziv Steinberg
Georgia stands poised to execute Warren Hill on Monday even though a Georgia court affirmed yesterday that Hill has an IQ of only 70. [read post]
21 Jul 2012, 8:47 am by Ziv Steinberg
Georgia stands poised to execute Warren Hill on Monday even though a Georgia court affirmed yesterday that Hill has an IQ of only 70. [read post]
21 Jul 2012, 2:52 am by SHG
While the Supreme Court held that a state could not put a retarded person to death in Atkins v. [read post]
20 Jul 2012, 1:52 pm by Rekha Arulanantham
A Tale of Three States: Executing the Mentally Disabled Georgia: On Monday, the State of Georgia stands ready to strap Warren Hill to a gurney, place IV lines in his arms, and pump his body with poison until he dies. [read post]
18 Jul 2012, 7:58 am by Conor McEvily
This blog’s online symposium on Kiobel v. [read post]
17 Jul 2012, 3:52 pm by jleaming@acslaw.org
In the Georgia case, which Cohen also covers, Warren Hill is facing the death penalty even though, as Cohen notes, a veteran Georgia state judge has said Hill is mentally disabled. [read post]
17 Jul 2012, 12:54 pm by Matt Murphy
 This is the standard of proof Georgia created when instructed not to execute the mentally retarded in Aktins v. [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 7:36 am by Steve Hall
In Georgia, meanwhile, the state supreme court has refused to designate Hill as mentally retarded, scoffing at the mandate of Atkins v. [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 7:13 am by admin
Escondido, both the decision itself (blue Georgia) and its syllabus (black Georgia), to understand why:   Nobody has asked the Supreme Court the right question. [read post]