Search for: "Hodge v. US" Results 261 - 280 of 1,008
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Oct 2007, 2:05 pm
It is clear to us that Officer Hodge's affidavit does not pass constitutional muster as it contained no substantial basis for the district judge's determination that probable cause existed to issue a search warrant. [read post]
3 Aug 2017, 10:37 am by Eric Goldman
Hodges case, which held that a crowdsourcing platform wasn’t liable for a fraudulent listing. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 8:39 am by Toby Lovett, Olswang LLP
The appeal focussed on whether the definition in Note 3 also applies where one RNG is used to serve several machines. [read post]
16 Jul 2021, 2:46 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Lord Sales, with whom Lord Hodge agrees, dissenting on Issue 3 holds that “negligence” as used in the clause in question does not refer to negligence in the performance of Triple Point’s contractual obligations. [read post]
16 Oct 2015, 1:15 am by Sean O'Beirne, Kingsley Napley LLP
Without the existence of a sufficient risk of the answers being used in criminal proceedings either against her or her spouse the Appellant could not avail herself of the common law privilege against self-incrimination. [read post]
26 Nov 2018, 1:48 am
The dust has started to settle following the Supreme Court decision in Warner-Lambert v Actavis [2018] UKSC 56 handed down recently (IPKat post here). [read post]
31 Jul 2015, 6:56 am by Josh Mirwis, Olswang LLP
Supreme Court The appeal was heard by Lord Neuberger, Lord Mance, Lord Clarke, Lord Sumption, Lord Carnwath, Lord Toulson and Lord Hodge between 21 and 23 July 2015. [read post]
11 Jul 2016, 4:05 am by Howard Friedman
L. 1 (2016)).Adedayo Damilola Oyebade, Human Rights Protection: A Panacea for the Use and Involvement of Women in Terrorism, (June 29, 2016).From SmartCILP and elsewhere:Alex Reed, RFRA v. [read post]
14 May 2015, 1:59 am by Justin Bates, Arden Chambers
Lord Carnwath agreed with Lord Hodge, save for the importance of the fact that Parliament had not overturned Manek or Desnousse. [read post]