Search for: "Holding v. State"
Results 261 - 280
of 63,278
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Nov 2015, 9:39 am
The Court of Appeals issued a published decision in Stankevich v Milliron (Docket No. 310710), holding that, after the United States Supreme Court decision in Obergefell v Hodges, ___ US ___; 135 S Ct 2584; 192 L Ed 2d 609 (2015), same-sex couples who are married, in this state or others, may assert the equitable parent doctrine. [read post]
11 Oct 2011, 8:42 am
Bond Topple Missouri V. [read post]
31 Mar 2010, 9:29 am
In State v. [read post]
25 May 2017, 7:06 pm
Robinson v. [read post]
21 Apr 2018, 12:41 pm
S. 61 (1975) (per curiam)United States v. [read post]
12 Jan 2022, 11:50 am
The post Juliana Arreaga Bravo v. [read post]
20 Dec 2013, 2:27 am
The judgments in R (Chester) v Secretary of State for Justice; R (McGeogh) v The Lord President of the Council and Another (Scotland) [2013] UKSC 63 were handed down in October 2013. [read post]
9 Jul 2007, 5:13 am
Fourth Circuit holds that the South Carolina Regulation of Manufacturers, Distributors and Dealers Act does not extend to sales consummated in another stateIn CAROLINA TRUCKS v. [read post]
9 Aug 2016, 11:22 am
On July 28, 2016, the Supreme Court of Ohio handed down a merit decision in State v. [read post]
12 Oct 2012, 4:37 pm
These death penalty cases consider the scope of the right to counsel in federal habeas proceedings where the convicted individual’s mental competency is at issue--whether a federal court can put a state prisoner’s habeas claim on perpetual hold until mental competency is restored. [read post]
10 Sep 2024, 8:29 am
State v. [read post]
9 Jul 2018, 7:03 am
See, e.g., Ray v. [read post]
23 Oct 2012, 7:15 pm
In support of its holding that Florida’s death penalty statute does not violate Ring, the Court first noted that the United States Supreme Court has repeatedly held that Florida’s judge-based sentencing system does not violate either the 6th or 8th Amendments. [read post]
3 Mar 2011, 7:25 am
The New Mexico Supreme Court, in State v. [read post]
16 Mar 2009, 5:21 pm
State of Haw., Sct. [read post]
25 Jul 2018, 3:29 pm
See United States v. [read post]
30 Jun 2009, 9:15 am
Yesterday, I did a post about the immediate impact of the United States Supreme Court's recent opinion in Arizona v. [read post]
20 Oct 2011, 6:30 pm
Whether an Article 134 Clause 1 or 2 Specification that fails to expressly allege either potential terminal element states an offense under the Supreme Court’s holdings in United States v. [read post]
9 May 2016, 10:21 am
On March 1, 2016, the Supreme Court decided Lockhart v. [read post]
2 Mar 2012, 7:58 am
Georgia, 11-6870, is probably a hold for United States v. [read post]
