Search for: "Hollingsworth "
Results 261 - 280
of 613
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Jun 2013, 5:19 am
Am I the only one who thinks all nine justices collectively wrote both opinions in Hollingsworth v. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 8:48 pm
The logic of Hollingsworth is that the initiative proponents lost all standing once the district court entered judgment (a judgment which does not bind or compel the proponents to do or not do anything). [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 7:58 pm
In Hollingsworth v. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 6:41 pm
United States, and Hollingsworth v. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 6:23 pm
Because of the Supreme Court’s decision in Hollingsworth v. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 6:18 pm
Supreme Court did not reach the merits of the Hollingsworth case. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 5:56 pm
They are-Hollingsworth v Perry (rejecting an appeal of the lower court decision overturning California's Proposition 8, on technical jurisdictional grounds), and US v. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 4:35 pm
Instead, the Windsor and Hollingsworth decisions will only increase the need to carefully examine the impact of state law on the effective and predictable management of literary and artistic estates. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 4:32 pm
Instead, the Windsor and Hollingsworth decisions will only increase the need to carefully examine the impact of state law on the effective and predictable management of literary and artistic estates. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 3:27 pm
See Hollingsworth v. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 3:18 pm
University of Texas, Gay, Gay Marriage, Gay Rights, History, Hollingsworth v. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 3:08 pm
The opinion in Hollingsworth v. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 2:40 pm
Professor Alvare filed an amicus brief in support of Hollingsworth and BLAG. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 2:40 pm
And Hollingsworth, while effectively vindicating District Judge Vaughn Walker’s masterful opinion striking down California’s Proposition 8, said nothing of substance about equality or liberty. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 2:00 pm
The same day, the Court also issued an opinion in Hollingsworth v. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 1:30 pm
In Hollingsworth v. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 1:30 pm
In Hollingsworth v. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 12:50 pm
The majority opinion in Hollingsworth contains an important passage that tips us off on the majority’s assumptions about the nature of marriage: The States’ interest in defining and regulating the marital relation, subject to constitutional guarantees, stems from the understanding that marriage is more than a routine classification for purposes of certain statutory benefits. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 12:37 pm
But it seems to me that Alito's theory of standing is, at the federal level, precisely what the majority in Hollingsworth (written by Roberts, joined by Scalia) demands when the state executive declines to enforce or defend: BLAG is part of an elected body, part of the government, and subject to the popular and electoral check of The People. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 12:35 pm
Instead, the Windsor and Hollingsworth decisions will only increase the need to carefully examine the impact of state law on the effective and predictable management of literary and artistic estates. [read post]
