Search for: "Holly v. Holly"
Results 261 - 280
of 723
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Jan 2015, 2:03 pm
Paul, Minnesota, and Mount Holly Township, New Jersey. [read post]
12 Jan 2015, 3:24 am
In an op-ed for the Los Angeles Times, Amanda Hollis-Brusky argues that, although the Court’s decision in Citizens United v. [read post]
7 Jan 2015, 2:36 pm
" [The Oklahoman] * Keeping politics out of King v. [read post]
7 Jan 2015, 9:10 am
Gallagher and Mount Holly v. [read post]
6 Jan 2015, 11:52 am
Less than two years later, the Court granted certiorari in Township of Mount Holly v. [read post]
6 Jan 2015, 8:30 am
Gallagher in 2012 and Township of Mount Holly v. [read post]
6 Jan 2015, 7:19 am
Gallagher and Mount Holly v. [read post]
31 Dec 2014, 4:00 pm
Kemp, working primarily in the biotech and medical fields, but now mostly works for ip21, K2 IP and his own consultancy, Holly IP. [read post]
29 Dec 2014, 2:16 am
*Biotechnology and Intellectual Property Rights: a book reviewKatfriend Suleman Ali (Holly IP) review Biotechnology and Intellectual Property Rights. [read post]
12 Dec 2014, 5:06 am
My post on Wednesday morning has attracted a large number of comments, including many thoughtful contributions, and so I would like to follow up concerning the wider issue of product-by-process claims (independent of the specific Hospira v Genentech case), gathering up, and responding to, some of the comments.In the meantime, readers interested in the decision itself may care to visit the report by Katfriend Suleman Ali (Holly IP) posted on the PatLit blog here, which has a more… [read post]
26 Nov 2014, 7:18 pm
Smith v City of Keego Harbor, 2014 WL 6632163 (ED MI 11/21/2014)Filed under: Current Caselaw, Standing [read post]
26 Nov 2014, 7:18 pm
Smith v City of Keego Harbor, 2014 WL 6632163 (ED MI 11/21/2014)Filed under: Current Caselaw, Standing [read post]
24 Nov 2014, 6:43 pm
Holly Gardens Citizens in Action, Inc. and Magner v. [read post]
4 Nov 2014, 3:49 pm
Hollis, Saikrishna Prakash, Michael D. [read post]
27 Oct 2014, 5:27 am
* Obviousness, common general knowledge and expectations of success: Leo gets a mauling Jeremy hosts this post by Suleman Ali (Holly IP) on Teva UK Limited & Teva Pharmaceuticals Limited v Leo Pharma A/S & Leo Laboratories Limited [2014] EWHC 3096 (Pat), a decision by Mr Justice Birss in the Patents Court, England and Wales which addresses two patent law cornerstones: obviousness and common general knowledge. [read post]
21 Oct 2014, 12:00 am
The author is occasional and much-appreciated guest contributor Suleman Ali (Holly IP), who writes as follows:Teva UK Limited & Teva Pharmaceuticals Limited v Leo Pharma A/S & Leo Laboratories Limited[2014] EWHC 3096 (Pat) is a decision by Mr Justice Birss in the Patents Court, England and Wales. [read post]
20 Oct 2014, 9:07 am
Of Mount Holly v. [read post]
14 Oct 2014, 6:09 am
Kelsh, Paul V. [read post]
2 Oct 2014, 7:56 am
Of Mount Holly v. [read post]
25 Sep 2014, 5:22 pm
You might think that "Robert Glen Golightly" is a fake name -- homage to Truman Capote's Holly Golightly, or Audrey Hepburn in the film version of the book.But, no, it's a real name. [read post]
