Search for: "Holt v. May"
Results 261 - 280
of 349
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Feb 2012, 5:37 am
No. 403 v. [read post]
16 Dec 2011, 1:34 pm
Law Lessons from Holt v. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 12:22 am
In Dugal v. [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 4:31 am
§ 4072; see also Van Holt v. [read post]
23 Oct 2011, 9:36 am
Similar to its federal counterpart, Colorado Rule of Evidence 606(b) provides that Upon an inquiry into the validity of a verdict or indictment, a juror may not testify as to any matter or statement occurring during the course of the... [read post]
3 Oct 2011, 9:12 am
Yet, in the real world, the legal issues left unaddressed at the end of the book would have likely spawned a multitude of suits, such as the case of Jarndyce v. [read post]
13 Sep 2011, 5:13 am
As the Commissioner of Education indicated in Fusco v Jefferson County School District, CEd, decided June 27, 2000, and Irving v Troy City School District, CEd 14,373, decided May 25, 2000: Comments critical of employee performance do not, without more, constitute disciplinary action. [read post]
14 Aug 2011, 5:00 am
For more on the book, including other reviews, check out the Verso site.The LA Times takes up a subsequent piece of the story with its review of Red Summer: The Summer of 1919 and the Awakening of Black America (Henry Holt), by journalist Cameron McWhirter. [read post]
3 Aug 2011, 8:34 pm
Holt Atherton Industries, Inc. v. [read post]
27 Jul 2011, 3:52 am
In the words of the hearing officer: As the Court of Appeals indicated in Holt v Webutick Central School District, 52 NY2d 625, a “counseling memorandum” that is given to an employee and placed in his or her personnel file constitutes a lawful means of instructing the employee concerning unacceptable performance and the actions that should be taken by the individual to improve his or her work. [read post]
8 Jul 2011, 10:17 am
May 17, 2011), a case addressing recovery of e-discovery costs, and Steuben Foods, Inc. v. [read post]
22 Jun 2011, 7:32 am
Ward v. [read post]
9 May 2011, 12:05 pm
The basic rule set out in Holt is that a statutory disciplinary provision such as Section 75 of the Civil Service Law does not require that an employee be given a hearing or permitted to grieve every comment or statement by his or her employer that he or she may consider a criticism. [read post]
29 Apr 2011, 3:00 am
Palumbo, [453 S.W.2d 780, 782 (Tenn. 1970)]; (3) that the plaintiff reasonably relied on the misrepresentation and suffered damage, Holt v. [read post]
15 Apr 2011, 4:13 pm
See Gill v. [read post]
31 Mar 2011, 5:57 am
"As the Commissioner of Education indicated in Fusco v Jefferson County School District, CEd, 14,396, decided June 27, 2000, and Irving v Troy City School District, CEd 14,373, decided May 25, 2000, 'Comments critical of employee performance do not, without more, constitute disciplinary action. [read post]
28 Mar 2011, 7:58 am
By Scott Holt and Lauren Moak [read post]
25 Feb 2011, 2:06 am
Times v. [read post]
13 Jan 2011, 4:06 pm
The claim was in any event also for 'such shares as the court may decide' and always subject to M's right to reside. [read post]
13 Jan 2011, 4:06 pm
The claim was in any event also for 'such shares as the court may decide' and always subject to M's right to reside. [read post]
