Search for: "House v. House"
Results 261 - 280
of 41,205
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Dec 2013, 12:51 pm
Given the Supreme Court of Canada’s recent decision in Canada (Attorney General) v. [read post]
22 Jun 2011, 7:41 am
Cendant Mobility Financial Corp. v. [read post]
18 Aug 2009, 12:53 pm
The case is Palmer/Sixth Street Properties, L.P., et al., v. [read post]
10 Jul 2010, 4:42 am
Lopez v. [read post]
9 Mar 2018, 11:37 am
Hoopes v. [read post]
9 Mar 2018, 11:37 am
Hoopes v. [read post]
31 Oct 2016, 8:09 am
Court precedence in such cases is varied, but comes down to establishing what risks were reasonable and what type of warning is adequate. in 1986, the Louisiana Court of Appeals ruled in Bouton v. [read post]
8 Jul 2022, 2:50 pm
Jackson Women’s Health Organization that overturned Roe v. [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 1:07 pm
Consideration of the two anti-arbitration bills follows the Supreme Court's decision Monday in Rent-a-Center v. [read post]
11 Aug 2024, 11:29 am
ZRR, R (On the Application Of) v London Borough of Bexley (2024) EWHC 2073 (Admin) This was a judicial review of Bexley’s contention that temporary accommodation offered to ZRR under s.190 Housing Act 1996 was suitable and its duty was discharged when ZRR refused that accommodation. [read post]
2 May 2007, 6:09 am
Hot off the press, the ruling of the House of Lords in the case of Douglas v Hello! [read post]
11 Jan 2016, 4:00 am
A 2015 Ohio appellant court decision out of Lorain County serves as an important reminder of the duty of care owed by real estate brokers/agents and the expensive consequences that result when communication between a real estate agent and a homeowner is imprecise.The case in question is Wheatley v. [read post]
29 Apr 2020, 9:16 am
House of Representatives v. [read post]
17 Jun 2008, 4:06 am
District Court Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly issued an opinion in CREW v. [read post]
9 Jun 2022, 3:55 am
Here are the materials in Oshiro v. [read post]
20 Jan 2023, 3:24 am
Campbell, R (On the Application Of) v London Borough of Ealing (2023) EWHC 10 (Admin) This judicial review concerns the relationship between the Care Act 2014 and housing legislation, in particular the effect of s.23 of the Care Act 2014, which prevents care and support needs being met through a local authority doing anything it is required to do under the Housing Act 1996. [read post]
9 Mar 2018, 4:00 am
As the Supreme Court observed in United States v. [read post]
10 Aug 2009, 3:43 pm
District Court, Kamaole Pointe Development LP v. [read post]
13 Jan 2018, 8:49 am
Additional Resources: Williams v. [read post]
21 Jul 2022, 7:24 pm
Texas and Obergefell v. [read post]
