Search for: "Hugh Tomlinson, QC"
Results 261 - 280
of 292
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Oct 2017, 4:03 pm
The finding was not disturbed by the Supreme Court of Canada (noted by Hugh Tomlinson QC). [read post]
27 May 2011, 6:40 am
They must do so for as long the Human Rights Act 1998 is in force and, indeed, as Hugh Tomlinson QC has pointed out, as long as we are a member of the European Union. [read post]
29 Apr 2021, 4:33 am
Google’s submissions: introductory remarks Antony White QC, on behalf of Google, introduced his submissions by stating that the case concerned important questions of law relating to damages under the Data Protection Act (“DPA”) regime and, further, the availability of the class action procedure under CPR 19.6. [read post]
5 Dec 2017, 4:32 pm
One of the barristers present, Hugh Tomlinson QC of Matrix chambers, is also the editor of the Inforrm media blog. [read post]
5 Nov 2010, 7:15 am
Other contributions included: Claire de Than, law lecturer at City University London on libel defences; Dominic Crossley, partner, Collyer Bristow on reframing the time it takes to get to a libel trial; Andrew Stephenson, senior partner, Carter Ruck on science and libel; Hugh Tomlinson QC, barrister, Matrix Chamber with the practitioner’s view; Gavin Sutter, Queen Mary University with an academic perspective; Professor Alastair Mullis & Dr Andrew Scott from… [read post]
9 Jul 2012, 4:12 am
The list of witnesses is available here and includes Lords Black and Hunt (Monday 9 July 2012), Michelle Stanistreet and Martin Moore (Tuesday 10 July 2012) and Angela Phillips (CCMR), and Hugh Tomlinson QC (Friday 13 July 2012). [read post]
2 Nov 2015, 1:51 am
Chambers and Partners also announced its UK Bar awards 2015 [pdf] with Matrix Chambers winning the award for defamation set of the year, Hugh Tomlinson QC defamation silk of the year, and Catrin Evans defamation junior of the year. [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 1:30 am
On Wednesday 2 or Thursday 3 November 2011, the Court of Appeal (Hughes, Black and Tomlinson LJJ) will hear the appeal in the case of Cambridge v Makin. [read post]
2 Apr 2015, 12:48 am
This was echoed by Hugh Tomlinson QC who suggested that it was difficult to see how Google could lawfully process sensitive personal data. [read post]
1 Sep 2010, 10:55 am
The background is considered in more detail in a series of earlier blog posts by Hugh Tomlinson QC under the title “Privacy – the Way Ahead? [read post]
25 Mar 2013, 2:41 am
Sweden, Copyright versus Freedom of Expression II – Dirk Voorhoof and Inger Høedt-Rasmussen Briefing Note on Exemplary Damages and Costs – Gill Phillips The fundamental right to insult our leaders: Three worrying cases in France, the West Bank and right here – Adam Wagner Leveson, Article 10 and Apologies: another red herring – Hugh Tomlinson QC Privacy, Monstering and the Press: the case of Lucy Meadows The Leveson press freedom law that the… [read post]
5 May 2011, 1:47 am
In deciding whether or not to grant the injunction the Court will first consider whether a reasonable person, in all the circumstances, would regard each item of information as “confidential” or “private”; if satisfied, the Court will then consider whether there is, in any event, some proper justification for publication of the information (for a fuller discussion see Hugh Tomlinson QC’s post ‘Part 1: Privacy Law – the way ahead? [read post]
16 Oct 2011, 5:14 am
On Monday and Tuesday 17 and 18 October 2011 the Supreme Court (Lords Phillips, Brown, Mance, Clarke and Dyson) will hear the appeal of the defendant, Times Newspapers, against the decision of the Court of Appeal ([2010] EWCA Civ 804) that the publication of an article on 2 June 2006 was not covered by Reynolds privilege. [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 5:03 pm
Hugh Tomlinson QC received rather kinder treatment in a Saturday Guardian profile. [read post]
7 Jan 2018, 4:05 pm
The case was covered by Hugh Tomlinson QC in the following Inforrm post. [read post]
18 Jan 2017, 4:03 pm
As Hugh Tomlinson QC notes on the Inforrm blog, it’s a ‘difficult’ case, ‘which is likely to produce a definitive restatement of the principles which apply when a party is seeking to derogate from the principles of open justice’. [read post]
26 Feb 2012, 1:00 am
The Freedom of Information Act has become a powerful tool for journalists and campaigners at both local and national levels seeking to reveal the workings of the state. [read post]
16 Oct 2011, 5:14 am
On Monday and Tuesday 17 and 18 October 2011 the Supreme Court (Lords Phillips, Brown, Mance, Clarke and Dyson) will hear the appeal of the defendant, Times Newspapers, against the decision of the Court of Appeal ([2010] EWCA Civ 804) that the publication of an article on 2 June 2006 was not covered by Reynolds privilege. [read post]
28 Aug 2012, 5:27 pm
Journalism and regulation Last week on Inforrm, Hugh Tomlinson QC considered whether compulsory regulation of the print media could be compatible with Article 10 of the European Convention. [read post]
23 Jan 2017, 1:25 am
The inauguration of President Donald J Trump on 20 January 2017 was the biggest media story in the world this week. [read post]