Search for: "I v. B"
Results 261 - 280
of 27,484
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Mar 2013, 3:02 pm
§ 512(c)(3)(B)(i). [read post]
14 Jan 2015, 7:20 pm
Argument analysis: Justices dubious of government's broad reading of False Claims ActDear readers: I commend to you the excellent analysis by Ronald Mann of SCOTUSblog of the oral argument held today at the Supreme Court in the case of Kellogg Brown and Root v. [read post]
28 Jan 2016, 9:02 am
§ 154(b), provides for the restoration of patent term in three circumstances: (i) an “A-Delay,” which awards PTA for delays arising from the USPTO’s failure to act by certain examination deadlines; (ii) a “B-Delay,” which awards PTA for an application pendency exceeding three years; and (iii) a “C-Delay,” which awards PTA for delays due to interferences, secrecy orders, and appeals. [read post]
13 Jan 2011, 3:13 am
McCabe said that "I started to walk into the basement and caught [my] right foot on short step landing. [read post]
8 Feb 2013, 5:30 am
BB&B initially moved to dismiss Hall’s complaint in accordance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) – failure to state a claim on which relief can be granted. [read post]
20 Oct 2011, 6:30 pm
The granted issues are: I. [read post]
21 Oct 2020, 6:42 am
Here: Ysleta Cert Petition Question presented: Whether the Restoration Act provides the Pueblo with sovereign authority to regulate non-prohibited gaming activities on its lands (including bingo), as set forth in the plain language of Section 107(b), the Act’s legislative history, and this Court’s holding in California v. [read post]
19 Oct 2020, 12:45 am
Oropeza v. [read post]
24 Sep 2009, 10:34 am
Noble v. [read post]
15 Nov 2011, 8:30 am
The trial in Milian v. [read post]
28 Jan 2013, 11:00 pm
Kappos Patent Term Adjustment (PTA) case (1:12cv574) (Exelixis II) that affirms the USPTO’s interpretation of 35 USC § 154(b)(1)(B)(i). [read post]
4 Jun 2013, 8:00 am
On March 6th, Texas Supreme Court Chief Justice Wallace B. [read post]
25 Jul 2017, 8:28 am
Justice Kennedy delivered the opinion of the Court with respect to Parts I, II, III, IV–A, and V, in which the Chief Justice and Justices Thomas and Alito joined. [read post]
30 Jul 2008, 10:57 am
Niemic v. [read post]
2 Jun 2007, 7:10 am
In reviewing fraudulent transfer cases, including Judge Mullins' recent opinion in the IMA case, I noticed citations to an opinion in the case of Kipperman v. [read post]
31 Jan 2024, 6:04 am
§ 1003.30 and inconsistent with the Supreme Court’s decision in Niz-Chavez v. [read post]
9 Jul 2018, 2:58 pm
I know there are so many things going awry these days and rights that were long recognized are being plowed over, and here is the latest example in Gary B. v. [read post]
3 Mar 2007, 2:48 am
I know, I know--I should stop there. [read post]
30 Jan 2008, 6:00 am
Gallegos v. [read post]
7 Nov 2012, 5:12 pm
I have today’s transcript from oral argument before the Supreme Court in Marx v. [read post]
