Search for: "IN RE: RULES FOR DISTRICT COURTS OF OKLAHOMA" Results 261 - 280 of 388
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Jan 2008, 7:35 am
Bureau of Prisons, No. 06-9130 I"n a case involving the scope of 28 U.S.C. section 2680, which carves out certain exceptions to the United States' waiver of sovereign immunity for torts committed by federal employees, the Court rules that section 2680's broad phrase "any other law enforcement officer" covers all law enforcement officers, and not just law enforcement officers enforcing customs or excise laws. [read post]
In that case, the court ruled that the government could take someone’s property for private economic development under the Fifth Amendment’s Takings Claus, saying it qualified as a “public use. [read post]
23 Jun 2015, 5:06 pm by Amy Howe
No matter how it rules, the Court’s decision in Obergefell v. [read post]
27 Dec 2017, 11:19 am by Wolfgang Demino
(Court Reporter: Timothy Miller) (kh) (Entered: 11/28/2017)11/29/2017MINUTE ORDER: In light of the Court's ruling on Plaintiff's 2 Emergency Motion for Temporary Restraining Order, it is hereby ORDERED that the 11 Motion for Leave to File Amici Curiae Brief is DENIED AS MOOT, without prejudice to re-filing for leave to file a brief with respect to the merits or any additional motions for injunctive relief. [read post]
27 Dec 2017, 11:19 am by Wolfgang Demino
(Court Reporter: Timothy Miller) (kh) (Entered: 11/28/2017)11/29/2017MINUTE ORDER: In light of the Court's ruling on Plaintiff's 2 Emergency Motion for Temporary Restraining Order, it is hereby ORDERED that the 11 Motion for Leave to File Amici Curiae Brief is DENIED AS MOOT, without prejudice to re-filing for leave to file a brief with respect to the merits or any additional motions for injunctive relief. [read post]
31 Jul 2020, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
  In keeping with its faux neutrality and commitment to the rule of law, the Court’s decisions in these cases were all procedural. [read post]
10 Jun 2019, 4:37 am by Gritsforbreakfast
And when they're caught driving without a license a second time, they're charged with a Class B misdemeanor, meaning police arrest them and counties must pay for incarceration and indigent defense costs. [read post]
4 Nov 2022, 5:40 am by JURIST Staff
Will the Republican Supreme Court preemptively rule that this is all poppycock and declare the winner as they did in Election 2000? [read post]
1 Dec 2023, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
The court partially blocked Smith’s effort in a ruling that relied on the Constitution’s “speech or debate” clause. [read post]
7 Jan 2021, 8:30 pm by Jim Sedor
Acting in a dispute over records related to President Trump’s Trump International Hotel, the District of Columbia Circuit Court of Appeals ruled lawmakers can resort to the courts to enforce an obscure statute known as the seven-member rule. [read post]
11 Sep 2013, 9:55 am by Kelly Phillips Erb
Supreme Court where the court ruled that the students had a right to free speech – even inside a public school. [read post]
22 May 2020, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
Supreme Court if he wants to block Maryland and the District of Columbia from pressing demands for his business records as his reelection campaign gets into full swing. [read post]
24 May 2010, 9:10 pm by cdw
LEXIS 9975 (6th Cir. 5/17/2010) “Denial of defendant’s motions for equitable relief, following his conviction of murdering his wife and sentence to death, is affirmed in part and dismissed in part where: 1) district court’s denial of defendant’s Rule 60(b) motion is affirmed as defendant has not come forward with clear and convincing evidence that the prosecution presented intentionally false material to the the district… [read post]
25 Mar 2022, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
The Federal Election Commission Slapped Marathon Petroleum Corporation with a $85,000 Fine After It Illegally Contributed $1 Million to 2 Republican PACs Yahoo News – Bryan Metzger (Business Insider) | Published: 3/18/2022 The FEC levied a $85,000 fine against Marathon Petroleum Company after it illegally contributed $1 million to a pair of PACs supporting House and Senate Republicans’ re-election campaigns. [read post]
4 Oct 2023, 7:54 am by Sasha Volokh
The District Court's use of a rigid public-private distinction here was misguided. [read post]
24 Jul 2018, 5:12 am by Kevin Kaufman
Complete Auto Remains the Rule, As Modified by Wayfair The South Dakota v. [read post]
23 Feb 2020, 4:17 am by Chris Castle
Journal (April 10, 2012); Redacted Transcript from Oral Argument on Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment and Rulings of the Court, DeKalb County Pension Fund v. [read post]
20 Aug 2012, 8:49 pm by Alan Greenfield
District Court for the Eastern District of New York, the effects of the settlement could prove to be far-reaching for both retailers, including franchisees and other small business owners, and consumers alike. [read post]