Search for: "IN THE INTEREST OF: F. A. G. R., A CHILD"
Results 261 - 280
of 291
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Oct 2019, 6:32 am
(See 999.312 (c) & (f)). [read post]
12 Oct 2017, 4:22 pm
(If you’re not interested in the more US-specific discussion, I suggest starting a few paragraphs into Question 10.) [read post]
21 Apr 2010, 6:54 am
R. [read post]
10 Apr 2019, 9:11 am
On Monday, I participated in a Copyright Office roundtable regarding their long-delayed report on Section 512. [read post]
8 Mar 2017, 11:28 am
R. [read post]
8 Mar 2017, 11:28 am
R. [read post]
4 Apr 2011, 3:37 pm
Abandoning or exposing a child when the life of that child is or is likely to be injured or endangered. 9. [read post]
28 Feb 2013, 6:27 am
As some of the ill children attend school only on Tuesdays and Thursdays, events that occurred on Tuesday, October 6 and Thursday, October 8, were of particular interest. [read post]
22 Oct 2013, 10:03 pm
An unnoticed side effect of the U.S. [read post]
29 Apr 2008, 7:13 am
Crosby, 397 F.3d 103 (2005), the order is affirmed over claims that the district court erroneously refused to consider the terms of a rejected plea offer in which the government had offered to recommend a lower sentence. [read post]
6 Mar 2022, 5:46 am
The Supreme Court [of the United States] subsequently rejected such inferences as incompatible with ordinary contract principles under federal law in M and G Polymers USA, LLC v Tackett (574 US 427 [2015]) and CNH Industrial N.V. v Reese (583 US 138 S Ct 761 [2018]), repudiating International Union, United Auto., Aerospace, and Agric. [read post]
6 Mar 2022, 5:46 am
The Supreme Court [of the United States] subsequently rejected such inferences as incompatible with ordinary contract principles under federal law in M and G Polymers USA, LLC v Tackett (574 US 427 [2015]) and CNH Industrial N.V. v Reese (583 US 138 S Ct 761 [2018]), repudiating International Union, United Auto., Aerospace, and Agric. [read post]
24 Jun 2020, 2:28 pm
["Publicly expressing anger toward an elected official is not a basis for entry of an injunction. [read post]
15 Feb 2022, 1:55 am
Forty-one tax wage and salary income, while New Hampshire exclusively taxes dividend and interest income and Washington taxes the capitals gains income of high earners. [read post]
27 Jan 2010, 6:25 pm
Here is the text of President Obama's SOTU Address as prepared for delivery: THE WHITE HOUSE Office of the Press Secretary January 27, 2010 Madame Speaker, Vice President Biden, Members of Congress, distinguished guests, and fellow Americans: Our Constitution declares that from time to time, the President shall give to Congress information about the state of our union. [read post]
17 Feb 2021, 8:12 am
Forty-one tax wage and salary income, while one state—New Hampshire—exclusively taxes dividend and interest income. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 4:02 pm
The “tidal wave” of defamation cases on the internet[3] is matched by “tidal waves” in other areas of electronic communication e.g. child pornography (R v Sharpe [2001] 1 SCR 45 at [166]; see also “Sentencing Offenders convicted of child pornography and child abuse material offences”, JCR Monograph 34, September 2010, p. [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 5:00 pm
Notwithstanding any other provision of law to the contrary, a person shall be strictly liable for a violation of this paragraph upon proof of a violation of N.J.S.2C:17-1 which resulted in bodily injury to any emergency services personnel; or (9) Knowingly, under circumstances manifesting extreme indifference to the value of human life, points or displays a firearm, as defined in subsection f. of N.J.S.2C:39-1, at or in the direction of a law enforcement officer; or (10) Knowingly points,… [read post]
28 Jan 2010, 5:51 am
I’ve bolded the bits about tax, incentives and “fees” in case you aren’t interested in the whole speech. [read post]
28 Mar 2022, 7:30 am
The United State Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit, opining that New York law offered "conflicting guidance" on the issue, certified the following question to New York State's Court of Appeals: "Does the 'special duty' requirement — that, to sustain liability in negligence against a municipality, the plaintiff must show that the duty breached is greater than that owed to the public generally — apply to claims of injury inflicted through municipal… [read post]
