Search for: "IN THE INTEREST OF C. B., A CHILD"
Results 261 - 280
of 2,428
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Aug 2017, 1:39 pm
” In order to be considered a Domestic Support Obligation not dischargeable in bankruptcy, the support obligation must meet the four requirements found in (A), (B), (C), and (D) above. [read post]
28 Jan 2009, 11:35 pm
(c) The court shall not hear evidence on a matter occurring before the last custody proceeding between the parties unless the matter relates to a change in the factors relating to the best interests of the child as described by section 8 and, if applicable, section 8.5 of this chapter. [read post]
25 Feb 2016, 4:16 pm
” The father’s appeal will be of great interest to those who decry the failings of the family law administration of justice. [read post]
22 Apr 2015, 6:55 am
Child support -- Modification -- Administrative support order -- Trial court fundamentally erred when it reduced father's monthly child support obligations without notice or hearingDEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, o/b/o Loretta Sermon, Cherral Smith, and Yata Frichelle Canty, Appellant, v. [read post]
29 Sep 2021, 3:21 pm
Trust B and Trust C were "irrevocable," while Trust A was "revocable. [read post]
29 Sep 2021, 3:21 pm
Trust B and Trust C were "irrevocable," while Trust A was "revocable. [read post]
7 Mar 2014, 1:58 am
2004, c. 2, provides as follows:7. [read post]
11 Apr 2024, 9:05 am
If the private foundation pays compensation that is deemed “unreasonable” to certain related parties the consequences are severe.[25] In the case of a 501(c)(4), compensation is permitted to a related party, however, as mentioned earlier in this article, the excess benefit transaction rules still apply to a 501(c)(4), and thus, a determination of “reasonable compensation” by the 501(c)(4) when making payments to a related party is still needed.… [read post]
19 Mar 2008, 4:00 am
I read an interesting article online about the ABCs of Water Safety. [read post]
29 Sep 2008, 1:00 pm
Child seat clip defects; b. [read post]
23 Aug 2012, 7:11 am
(c) Notwithstanding subdivision (b), the local child support agency may not order an individual to submit to genetic tests if the individual has been found to have good cause for failure to cooperate in the determination of paternity pursuant to Section 11477 of the Welfare and Institutions Code. [read post]
2 Feb 2013, 12:06 pm
On his death, his interest in his house and savings pass by right-of-survivorship to his second wife, leaving little or nothing in his estate. [read post]
2 Dec 2019, 7:15 am
§ 109(B). [read post]
2 Dec 2019, 7:15 am
§ 109(B). [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 7:04 am
The court therefore determined that it was not in the best interests of the child to disrupt her legitimate paternal relationship with respondent father. [read post]
22 Apr 2016, 5:10 pm
C. [read post]
22 Apr 2015, 2:46 pm
The Applicable Law B. [read post]
3 Apr 2022, 6:49 am
” 750 ILCS 5/505(a)(3.5) When deviating from guidelines child support, Illinois divorce and parentage courts must focus on “the best interest of the child in light of the evidence, including, but not limited to, one or more of the following relevant factors: (a) the financial resources and needs of the child; (b) the financial resources and needs of the custodial parent; (c) the standard of living the child would… [read post]
15 Jan 2011, 11:08 am
(b) In all Indian child custody proceedings, as defined in the federal Indian Child Welfare Act, the court shall consider all of the findings contained in subdivision (a), strive to promote the stability and security of Indian tribes and families, comply with the federal Indian Child Welfare Act, and seek to protect the best interest of the child. [read post]
27 Nov 2021, 6:26 am
Therefore, no hearing on the validity of process of service was necessary and the Family Court should not have dismissed the petition.Although the mother did not specifically seek an upward modification based on an increase in the father’s income by 15% or more, it was proper to modify the father’s child support obligation on this basis, as the parties declined to opt out of Family Court Act § 451(3)(b). [read post]
