Search for: "IN THE INTEREST OF R. P., A CHILD" Results 261 - 280 of 837
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 May 2017, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
R (A) (a Child) (by her litigation friend B) v Secretary of State for Health, heard 2 November 2016. [read post]
13 May 2017, 12:30 pm by Marta Requejo
Based on the principle that a child’s parenthood cannot be subject to private autonomy, in cases where we are only faced with facts (reproductive practice) and private acts (surrogacy arrangements) the child’s parenthood will not be established yet (conflict of Laws method), in order to serve her best interest. [read post]
6 May 2017, 8:08 am
& PhD (law) and Professor with special responsibilities in Business & Human Rights, Department of Management, Society and Communication (MSC) Copenhagen Business School, has announced two quite interesting calls for papers. [read post]
28 Apr 2017, 1:16 pm
  (See Canfield, supra, 13 Cal.2d at p. 11.)We now turn to sections 15306.5 and 15307.Section 15307 (…) appears to allow any creditor to access all of a beneficiary’s interest in a spendthrift trust besides what is necessary for the beneficiary’s education and support, whereas section 15306.5 limits creditors to only 25 percent of the same interest. [read post]
3 Mar 2017, 6:34 am by Ed. Microjuris.com Puerto Rico
En cuanto a la rama legislativa véanse los proyectos P. de la C. 2073 de 24 de septiembre de 2009 y P. de la C. 2846 del 1 de septiembre de 2010 que no prosperaron en la legislatura; ambos reconocían la vigencia de la Ley 82 ya que proponían la derogación de la misma. [read post]
17 Feb 2017, 2:25 pm
His wages were garnished three times to pay child support for children that were not his. [read post]
4 Feb 2017, 4:29 pm by INFORRM
Guidance in this area was re-examined with the publication this week of an Opinion by Advocate General (AG) Bobek of the Court of Justice of the EU (CJEU) in a case referred for a preliminary ruling to the CJEU by the Latvian Supreme Court: Valsts policijas Rīgas reģiona pārvaldes Kārtības policijas pārvalde v Rīgas pašvaldības SIA ‘Rīgas satiksme’, Case C-13/16, 26 January 2017. [read post]
2 Feb 2017, 1:22 pm by Andrew Hamm
App’x 769 (10th Cir. 2012) (joined opinion) Despite challenge to child pornography sentence under Commerce Clause, sentence was substantively reasonable United States v. [read post]
27 Jan 2017, 4:07 pm by INFORRM
  Recital 40 notes that ‘service providers have a duty to act, under certain circumstances, with a view to preventing or stopping illegal activities’ and that the immunity provisions ‘should not preclude the development and effective operation, by the different interested parties, of technical systems of protection and identification and of technical surveillance instruments made possible by digital technology’. [read post]
18 Jan 2017, 4:03 pm by INFORRM
[viii] This exercise would also help detach media interests from other interests. [read post]
17 Jan 2017, 6:34 pm by Robichaud
For very serious offences, s. 42(2)(r) of the YCJA permits the imposition of an IRCS order as part of a youth sentence. [read post]
13 Jan 2017, 4:21 pm by INFORRM
   Background The claimant was one of a number of men arrested in March 2012 in connection with a Thames Valley Police investigation into allegations of child sex grooming and prostitution. [read post]
8 Dec 2016, 8:47 am by James P. Flynn
That Agero reportedly sued Schneider on Christmas Eve, when Schneider’s oldest child was five years old, might lend credence to the charge. [read post]