Search for: "INDIRECT PLAINTIFF CLASS"
Results 261 - 280
of 507
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Aug 2013, 3:35 pm
VRASTIL, ETC., Appellee. 5th District.Wrongful death -- Product liability -- Tobacco -- Engle progeny case -- Manifestation of disease for purpose of inclusion in Engle class membership -- Trial court did not err in instructing jury that decedent's manifestation of peripheral vascular disease occurred when he had symptoms of the disease, instead of when decedent was on notice of the causal connection between his smoking and the disease -- Conflict certified -- Trial court did not err in… [read post]
7 Aug 2013, 9:47 am
Dang alleged that the agreement violated Sherman Act Section 1 and sought injunctive relief on behalf of a nationwide class of indirect purchasers. [read post]
7 Aug 2013, 8:47 am
Dang alleged that the agreement violated Sherman Act Section 1 and sought injunctive relief on behalf of a nationwide class of indirect purchasers. [read post]
5 Aug 2013, 11:43 am
Plaintiff Save the Plastic Bag Coalition (the “Coalition”) sued claiming CEQA required an EIR for such an ordinance, but the trial court denied its writ petition. [read post]
23 Jul 2013, 3:04 pm
Arbitration & Mediation, Class Action, Consumer Law This case involved arbitration proceedings stemming from plaintiff's class action suit alleging, among other things, that SouthernLINC's termination fees were unlawful penalties under Georgia law. [read post]
28 Jun 2013, 6:01 pm
The fate of the former class must not be considered. [read post]
23 May 2013, 7:45 am
Indeed, this harm occurred before the plaintiff ever operated the [product]. [read post]
9 Apr 2013, 9:01 pm
Yet courts routinely certify cases as class actions for liability only, relegating plaintiff class members to individual litigation when the time comes to calculate damages. [read post]
8 Apr 2013, 11:01 am
The District Court, however, noted that the plaintiff named all three defendants on every claim asserted indicating that, even if the alleged liability may be indirect, those defendants faced exposure to the vast majority of the members of the proposed classes and a “primary defendant” for the purposes of CAFA. [read post]
6 Apr 2013, 8:44 am
(Alioto Law Firm) for Indirect Purchaser Plaintiffs. [read post]
4 Apr 2013, 7:00 am
The problem with these settlements was not that the plaintiffs lacked the leverage to cut a good deal; indeed, the indirect purchasers in Sullivan and the investors in In re AIG did just fine. [read post]
2 Apr 2013, 2:42 pm
Defendant in administrative class action is entitled to discovery from the plaintiff’s social media accounts. [read post]
15 Mar 2013, 1:29 pm
Because there is no indirect benefit to the class from the defendant’s giving the money to someone else, it is questionable whether most cy pres distributions effectuate the interests of the silent class members. [read post]
12 Mar 2013, 10:24 pm
In our view, actions can come from various D&O claims plaintiffs that include customers, vendors, employees, competitors, suppliers and a host of other stakeholders. [read post]
8 Mar 2013, 8:59 am
We’re far more concerned about attempts to pursue medical monitoring through class actions. [read post]
4 Mar 2013, 4:11 am
Claims dismissed, unless plaintiff could add additional class representatives. [read post]
20 Feb 2013, 5:00 am
If California law is ultimately chosen, this could allow nationwide indirect purchaser class actions in cases where the conspiracy originated from or was substantially connected to this state. [read post]
16 Feb 2013, 8:58 am
PROF'L CONDUCT R. 5.6(b).There are three main public policy rationales for Rule 5.6(b): (i) to ensure the public will have broad access to legal representation; (ii) to prevent awards to plaintiffs that are based on the value of keeping plaintiffs' counsel out of future litigation, rather than the merits of plaintiffs case; and (iii) to limit conflicts of interest. [read post]
4 Feb 2013, 2:35 pm
One American academic has analysed all of the US indirect purchaser class certification decisions. [read post]
28 Jan 2013, 6:52 pm
In coming to her decision, Madam Justice Gropper reviewed the authorities in BC for approving settlements in class actions. [read post]
