Search for: "INSURANCE COMPANY B" Results 261 - 280 of 8,145
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Nov 2015, 7:17 am by Mark S. Humphreys
The case is styled, Monclat Hospitality, LLC vs Landmark American Insurance Company. [read post]
24 Oct 2015, 7:17 am by Mark S. Humphreys
The case is styled, Monclat Hospitality, LLC vs Landmark American Insurance Company. [read post]
1 Sep 2011, 7:23 am by Peter N. Freiberg
Knowingly misrepresenting to a policyholder pertinent facts or policy provisions relating to coverages; b. [read post]
31 Aug 2011, 7:41 am by Peter N. Freiberg
Knowingly misrepresenting to a policyholder pertinent facts or policy provisions relating to coverages; b. [read post]
26 May 2015, 7:16 am by Mark S. Humphreys
These misrepresentations are also against the law under the DTPA, Section 17.46(b), which is incorporated into the Texas Insurance Code. [read post]
13 Jun 2007, 5:48 am
Allegedly Wrongful Denial of Insurance Policy Benefits Satisfies Commonality and Typicality Requirements for Class Action Treatment, and While Rule 23(b)(1) and (b)(2) Classes Would not be Certified, Louisiana Federal Court Holds that Rule 23(b)(3) Class Action Treatment was Warranted Plaintiff filed a breach of contract class action against her health insurer arising out of the denial of insurance benefits allegedly due and owing under a… [read post]
14 Nov 2019, 3:00 am by Daniel Ballard
A tool that every policyholder attorney should use is the 30(b)(6) deposition. [read post]
If you have recently been in a Virginia car accident, and you are dealing with a difficult insurance company, consider calling Attorney Charles B. [read post]
4 Nov 2012, 10:00 pm by Tonya Newman
Oct. 12, 2012), the Central District of California dismissed Evanston Insurance Company’s subrogation claim against Mattel in the long-running trade secrets dispute between Mattel and Evanston’s insured, MGA Entertainment Inc., concluding that because an insurer stands in the shoes of its insured with respect to subrogation, Evanston was bound by the 14-day time limit on seeking attorneys’ fees prescribed by Federal Rule of Civil… [read post]
13 Oct 2023, 4:17 am by Mary Anne Peck
But critically, in exchange, the California Department of Insurance will permit insurance companies to charge consumers more. [read post]
22 Jul 2024, 10:15 am by Jeffrey Bohn
” Effective October 1, 2024, the Act permits “[a]ny sponsored captive insurance company, including a sponsored captive insurance company licensed as a special purpose financial captive insurance company…upon application…and with the [insurance] commissioner’s prior written approval, convert one or more protected cells or incorporated protected cells…. [read post]