Search for: "Identification Devices v. United States"
Results 261 - 280
of 352
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Oct 2011, 11:06 am
This is my second post on United States v. [read post]
27 Oct 2011, 12:32 am
(Orin Kerr) This is my second post on United States v. [read post]
26 Oct 2011, 6:33 am
Today in the Community we are discussing Arizona v. [read post]
7 Oct 2011, 2:38 pm
Tracked: The Supreme Court Shouldn't Let Technology Trump the Constitution This week we filed a friend-of-the-court brief in United States v. [read post]
14 Sep 2011, 9:33 am
The details appear below: * United States v. [read post]
12 Jul 2011, 3:48 am
Myall Australia Pty Ltd v RPL Central Pty Ltd [2011] APO 48 (link to be provided when available) Lid dip: Patentology [read post]
1 Jul 2011, 1:06 pm
But the shame is really on the Chief Justice of the United States, who demonstrated how out of touch he is with the current world of legal scholarship and the potential contribution of legal scholars to the work of judges. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 6:56 pm
("ACI") appeals from the final judgment of the United States District Court for the Southern District of California. [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 1:00 pm
-EU Mutual Legal Assistance Agreement, specifically: mutual legal assistance to administrative authorities; expedited transmission of requests; use limitations; identification of bank information; joint investigative teams; and video conferencing. [read post]
16 May 2011, 8:08 pm
His device was called a hydrosphygmograph. [read post]
13 May 2011, 1:28 pm
The description of the collateral must “make possible the identification of the collateral described. [read post]
9 May 2011, 12:35 pm
But not everyone saw the effects of this new technology as benign: some saw the prophesied erosion of state power as an invitation to anarchy, or as opening the door to the very evils that the state power was being deployed to prevent. [read post]
15 Apr 2011, 9:01 pm
There is a line of cases starting with Talley v California, then McIntyre v Ohio Elections Comm’n, and running through the more recent Watchtower Bible and Tract Society, in which the Supreme Court sets out a sweeping constitutional right to anonymous religious and political speech. [read post]
15 Mar 2011, 7:51 am
Patent No. 6,725,281 entitled SYNCHRONIZATION OF CONTROLLED DEVICE STATE USING STATE TABLE AND EVENTING IN DATA-DRIVEN REMOTE DEVICE CONTROL MODEL and owned by Microsoft. [read post]
15 Mar 2011, 7:51 am
Patent No. 6,725,281 entitled SYNCHRONIZATION OF CONTROLLED DEVICE STATE USING STATE TABLE AND EVENTING IN DATA-DRIVEN REMOTE DEVICE CONTROL MODEL and owned by Microsoft. [read post]
30 Jan 2011, 12:49 pm
Nielsen alleged that it designed its maps using “a set of proprietary criteria and testing devices, as well as the experience and judgment of its analysts, to partition regions of the United States into geographically-distinct marketing regions, or designated marketing areas (the 'DMA Regions').... [read post]
13 Jan 2011, 6:39 am
United States v. [read post]
22 Dec 2010, 10:22 pm
Abstract: This essay reads the public controversy surrounding Sonja Sotomayor’s nomination and confirmation to Associate Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States. [read post]
13 Dec 2010, 12:36 pm
This is also consistent with Form 18, which requires identification of the product or device alleged to infringe on the patent. [read post]
5 Dec 2010, 4:27 pm
Southwest v. [read post]
