Search for: "In Interest of LJ"
Results 261 - 280
of 980
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Jun 2011, 12:50 am
However, Munby LJ preempted this criticism. [read post]
10 Feb 2009, 12:30 am
This would force receiving parties to sensibly value their costs from the outset and would almost certainly dramatically reduce the number of detailed assessment hearing.I would be interested to hear readers' views.Click image to enlarge:www.qccartoon.com [read post]
8 Sep 2011, 6:47 am
She had correctly noted that in that case Butler-Sloss LJ had made it clear that personal injury damages were not sacrosanct and could therefore be considered by the court when deciding an ancillary relief application. [read post]
28 Jun 2011, 2:58 am
Carnwath LJ commented that “Common sense points to a judge only trial here“. [read post]
9 May 2010, 9:50 pm
As we have commented before on this site, this is one more step in the process of de-privileging of religious beliefs in the hierarchy of interests under the Convention for which Kokkinakis v Greece (1994) 17 EHRR 397 remains an important and serviceable authority. [read post]
28 Jul 2008, 10:16 am
In considering the application, the judge cited Rix LJ in Konkola v Coromin who said that although a stay based on case management is possible it requires "rare and compelling" circumstances. [read post]
10 Mar 2013, 7:32 am
I’d be very interested to hear other people’s views/experiences. [read post]
23 Jun 2015, 7:40 am
Instead, Floyd LJ declared the transfer of value from the bank to Melissa occurred “with the agreement by the bank to give up its interest or estate in Rush Green Hall… The fact that the charges remained in place whilst the bank singed the forms is not significant. [read post]
16 Dec 2009, 10:02 am
" Wendy R. leibowitz, Communication in the E·Mail Era: Deciphering the Risks and Fears, Nat'l LJ., Aug. 4, 1997, at B9. [read post]
10 Nov 2009, 5:39 pm
This is an interesting issue and one that, to be honest, I had not previously given much thought to. [read post]
16 Mar 2015, 8:35 am
In light of this it is interesting to examine how Lord Kerr reached the opposite verdict. [read post]
8 Feb 2011, 4:10 pm
In this feature we revisit older posts which remain of current interest. [read post]
30 Jul 2019, 3:54 am
Issue 2: Proper construction of the words “interested in” This issue turned on the proper understanding of the “validity principle” in construing agreements. [read post]
10 Feb 2025, 9:03 am
Where Google had used signs including SHORTS, the combination of their descriptive nature and the claimant’s marks’ low distinctiveness led the judge to conclude that there was no likelihood of consumers being confused.The judgment is a long one, including interesting discussions of points such us: (1) whether the claimant could overcome an invalidity attack by narrowing its specification to carve out any coverage of “short films” (this was not needed in the end but… [read post]
17 Dec 2010, 1:06 am
This case has an interesting twist. [read post]
15 Jun 2011, 11:06 pm
It is an interesting illustration to my discussion on the covenant of quiet enjoyment which I wrote about here and the meaning of the word ‘enjoy’. [read post]
18 Mar 2008, 2:43 pm
If we published 12-16 articles a year, then that would be a 1% acceptance rate at that particular journal; I'm not sure if we lost any articles to Yale LJ, so the publication and acceptance rates would be close to the same. [read post]
28 Mar 2007, 1:14 am
” Full story Verkaik reminds us of the two Immigration judges and the Brazilian cleaner episode and the case being brought against Richards LJ for alleged flashing Lord Chief Justice, Lord Phillips is supporting the establishment of a 24 hour helpline to help judges cope with the stress of judicial office. [read post]
22 Jun 2009, 5:30 am
It is APIL's experience that the claims handlers dealing with large claims are better and easier to deal with".It is somewhat odd if this is the view being expressed by claimant representatives and is one being accepted by Jackson LJ as being accurate. [read post]
21 Oct 2011, 3:44 am
The borrowers' primary argument was that, in the absence of an explanation, the commission was so egregious that it gave rise to a conflict of interest, which the lender had a duty to disclose. [read post]
