Search for: "In Matter of Brown*" Results 261 - 280 of 10,050
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Aug 2013, 12:50 pm by Woodrow Pollack
In the NXP decision, the Court wrote a detailed opinion explaining the reasoning behind this practice, and it's a short but worthwhile read: In this Circuit, it is well settled that “[t]he operations of the courts and the judicial conduct of judges are matters of utmost public concern” and the integrity of the judiciary is maintained by the public's right of access to court proceedings. [read post]
19 Aug 2015, 6:52 am by Joy Waltemath
Nor did the lower court err in granting the employer’s motion for judgment as a matter of law at the second trial. [read post]
7 Nov 2007, 6:50 pm
Robert Brown discuss the practical business impact (or not) from a corporate governance perspective, of having a diverse board of directors. [read post]
13 Aug 2007, 10:10 am
"Baron Bramwell: "The matter does not appear to me now as it appears to have appeared to me then. [read post]
4 May 2011, 2:44 pm by scanner1
The Montana Supreme Court has issued an Unpublished Opinion in the following matter: DA 10-0589, 2011 MT 96N, RICHARD MOTTA, Granite County Justice of the Peace, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. [read post]
11 May 2011, 7:47 am by scanner1
The Montana Supreme Court has issued an Opinion and Order in the following matter: OP 11-0206, 2011 MT 97N, THE OFFICE OF THE STATE PUBLIC DEFENDER, Petitioner, v. [read post]
22 Dec 2010, 12:05 pm by South Florida Lawyers
I write only to remark that we tread on dangerous ground when we opine on matters not before us, and express my belief it is as likely as not in this case that Crombie has been, at least to some extent, the author of her own undoing.Hey, I was with Judge S through the "we tread on dangerous grounds when we opine on matters not before us" but correct me if I'm wrong, isn't the rest of the sentence -- "my belief it is as likely as not in this case that… [read post]
2 Jan 2010, 9:54 am by thejaghunter
Senate came into question, people said it didn’t matter. [read post]
16 Mar 2012, 8:54 am by Tai-Heng Cheng
As Professor Ku mentioned earlier this week, one test of the value of a theory is how well it explains the subject matter of the theory. [read post]
2 Dec 2013, 1:14 am by Laura Sandwell
In the matter of LC (Children) (Nos. 1 and 2), heard 11 November 2013. [read post]
2 Dec 2013, 1:14 am by Laura Sandwell
In the matter of LC (Children) (Nos. 1 and 2), heard 11 November 2013. [read post]
14 Jan 2021, 6:20 am by Gibbons P.C.
He also represented clients in cutting-edge permitting and regulatory compliance matters, and on brownfields redevelopment projects. [read post]
14 Jan 2021, 6:20 am by Gibbons P.C.
He also represented clients in cutting-edge permitting and regulatory compliance matters, and on brownfields redevelopment projects. [read post]
14 Feb 2024, 7:15 am by Kaufman Dolowich
Catherine Casavant (Hackensack, N.J.) counsels and defends clients on insurance coverage matters involving directors and officers, errors and omissions and professional liability policies. [read post]
14 Jan 2021, 6:20 am by Gibbons P.C.
He also represented clients in cutting-edge permitting and regulatory compliance matters, and on brownfields redevelopment projects. [read post]
10 Feb 2017, 7:54 am by The Federalist Society
The Office claimed that the name would likely be disparaging towards “persons of Asian descent,” citing the Disparagement Clause of the Lanham Act of 1946, which prohibits trademarks that “[consist] of or [comprise] immoral, deceptive, or scandalous matter; or matter which may disparage or falsely suggest a connection with persons, living or dead, institutions, beliefs, or national symbols, or bring them into contempt, or disrepute. [read post]
11 Jun 2020, 12:08 pm
"From "There’s an effort to get me fired at Cornell for criticizing the Black Lives Matter Movement" by William Jacobson (at Legal Insurrection). [read post]