Search for: "In Re: Appointment to the Civil Procedural Rules Committee" Results 261 - 280 of 342
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Aug 2012, 2:01 pm by Brenda Fulmer
Boehringer Ingelheim also filed motion to dismiss these first-filed cases on various legal bases under Rule 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure with assertions that the plaintiffs’ complaints failed to state a proper cause of action against Pradaxa’ s manufacturer for various reasons. [read post]
20 Aug 2012, 2:01 pm by Brenda Fulmer
Boehringer Ingelheim also filed motion to dismiss these first-filed cases on various legal bases under Rule 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure with assertions that the plaintiffs’ complaints failed to state a proper cause of action against Pradaxa’ s manufacturer for various reasons. [read post]
7 Aug 2012, 4:47 am by David J. DePaolo
Mario Cuomo and the New York Legislature took a major step to end patronage in 1994, when they ended the political appointment of workers' compensation law judges.The Legislature technically "fired" all the judges, said one former board official, and required the judges to pass civil service exams to regain their jobs. [read post]
22 Jul 2012, 5:09 pm by INFORRM
The appointment of the independent members of the board will be through an independent appointments process determined by the trust Board itself in line with public appointments procedures. [read post]
20 Jul 2012, 2:25 am by V.D.RAO
The issue of approaching two forums with the same relief and seeking the same relief concluded by the competent forum are dealt-with under section 10 and 11 of Civil Procedure Code, 1908 and those are reproduced below without explanations. [read post]
22 May 2012, 1:05 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
A Fellow in the American College of Employee Benefit Council, immediate past Chair of the American Bar Association (ABA) RPTE Employee Benefits & Other Compensation Group and current Co-Chair of its Welfare Benefit Committee, Vice-Chair of the ABA TIPS Employee Benefits Committee, a council member of the ABA Joint Committee on Employee Benefits, and past Chair of the ABA Health Law Section Managed Care & Insurance Interest Group, Ms. [read post]
26 Mar 2012, 5:29 am by Dianne Saxe
The issue of how costs motions are handled may be better addressed by individual tribunals’ rules and procedures. [read post]
26 Mar 2012, 5:29 am by Dianne Saxe
The issue of how costs motions are handled may be better addressed by individual tribunals’ rules and procedures. [read post]
3 Feb 2012, 4:05 pm by Blogspot
No one shall be deprived of his liberty except on such grounds and in accordance with such procedure as are established by law. [read post]
20 Jan 2012, 6:07 pm by fl_litig8r
The procedural rules significantly differ from most state courts, with many potential traps for the unwary. [read post]
4 Dec 2011, 1:42 pm
Feerick will file the affidavit required under Rule 53 (b) (3) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by December 7, 2011. [read post]
1 Dec 2011, 4:30 pm by Benjamin Wittes
Meteorologically it tells me that we’re going to enjoy an ideal day for training tomorrow. [read post]
3 Nov 2011, 11:53 am by Max Kennerly, Esq.
Most everyday citizens won’t encounter the Commonwealth Court unless they’re suing the government or if they’re appealing a workers’ compensation or unemployment decision. [read post]
2 Nov 2011, 12:40 pm
Section 35 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, (for short 'the Code') relates to costs and is extracted below: "35. [read post]
14 Oct 2011, 9:51 am by Dean Gonsowski
  The dialogue began in earnest a year ago at the Duke Civil Litigation Conference and picked up speed following an eDiscovery “mini-conference” held in Dallas last month (led by the Discovery Subcommittee –  appointed by the Advisory Committee on Civil Rules). [read post]
14 Oct 2011, 9:51 am by Dean Gonsowski
  The dialogue began in earnest a year ago at the Duke Civil Litigation Conference and picked up speed following an eDiscovery “mini-conference” held in Dallas last month (led by the Discovery Subcommittee –  appointed by the Advisory Committee on Civil Rules). [read post]
24 Sep 2011, 3:58 am
The court affirmed the bankruptcy court's ruling as to the release of discovery documents disclosing Father M's name under Rule 26(c), because the public's serious safety concerns could not be addressed if Father M's name was redacted. [read post]