Search for: "In Re: Mark Green v."
Results 261 - 280
of 658
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Jul 2014, 5:07 pm
Barber-Greene Co., 26 F.3d 1573, 1584 (Fed. [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 11:55 am
Oct. 20, 2008); Green v. [read post]
7 Jul 2014, 4:35 am
Overstock.com, Inc. v. [read post]
1 Jul 2014, 2:33 am
Mother Earth Brewing, LLC., Opposition No. 91203200 [Section 2(d) opposition to registration of SUNNY HAZE for "beer; brewed malt-based alcoholic beverage in the nature of a beer," in view of the registered mark PURPLE HAZE for beer].July 9, 2014 - 2 PM: In re Delta Airlines, Inc., Serial No. 85196441 [Refusals of ATLANTA'S HOMETOWN AIRLINE for "transportation of goods, passengers and travellers by air" [AIRLINE disclaimed] under Section 2(d) in view of the… [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 4:50 am
These changes resolved the ambiguity about the standard to be applied and made it clear that the bill does not reinstate the free exercise standard to the high water mark as found in Sherbert v. [read post]
22 May 2014, 7:44 am
This makes Greene’s point important enough to deserve a name: How about “agonistic legitimation”? [read post]
13 Jan 2014, 1:51 am
Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs v Marks and Spencer plc, heard 25 – 26 November 2013. [read post]
9 Jan 2014, 1:37 pm
Milhollin, 444 U.S. 555, 568 (1980) (citation and quotation marks omitted). [read post]
22 Dec 2013, 7:21 am
Italian Colors Restaurant, 133 S.Ct. 2304 (2013) • Mark S. [read post]
16 Dec 2013, 6:36 am
Individuals generally receive such coverage in one of four ways: (i) through Medicaid, if they’re eligible; (ii) through Medicare, if they’re eligible; (iii) through an employer-provided insurance plan, if their employer offers one; or (iv) on the government “exchange,” if the individual is not covered in one of the other three ways. [read post]
2 Dec 2013, 9:03 pm
Arguing for the federal government in the case of United States v. [read post]
29 Nov 2013, 5:10 am
IP Tango reports that unregistered marks are getting a bit of respect in the Argentine courts, at appellate level at any rate, in a battle for SAN GENARO pasta. [read post]
20 Nov 2013, 2:02 pm
” [Gawker] * The justices who penned Bush v. [read post]
19 Nov 2013, 7:24 am
The Federal Court relied on Simpson Strong-Tie Co. v. [read post]
18 Nov 2013, 1:37 pm
Smith-Green Mortuary Sciences College Student Disciplined for Threatening Facebook Posts–Tatro v. [read post]
9 Oct 2013, 6:44 pm
* * * “In Furman v. [read post]
29 Sep 2013, 6:53 pm
Separation of Powers and Checks and Balances --Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. [read post]
11 Sep 2013, 9:55 am
That case, Tinker v. [read post]
9 Aug 2013, 7:13 am
Rigidity v. flexibility: advocates for more specific defenses. [read post]
