Search for: "In Re: Mark M." Results 261 - 280 of 7,633
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Feb 2014, 11:37 am by Kevin Goldberg
But I gave readers fair warning that I’m no NFL expert. [read post]
8 May 2008, 5:15 am
I'm sure you might be thinking, "Why, Mark, Why? [read post]
11 Aug 2023, 3:29 am
" Applicant Simply Southern argued that its mark, when said aloud,"is literally: ‘s, exclamation point, m, ply (or p-l-y). [read post]
27 Apr 2016, 3:02 am
In re DLMW-BBQ, LLC, Serial No. 86457938 (April 25, 2016) [not precedential]. [read post]
25 Sep 2009, 3:59 am
MetLife argued that the residual goodwill in the mark, plus O'M's bad faith exploitation of the mark, entitled it to relief, but the caselaw didn't support this. [read post]
2 Jan 2018, 4:19 am
January 11, 2018 - 2 PM: Trek Bicycle Corporation v Celestron Acquisition LLC, Oppositions Nos. 91213696, 91213957, and 91213962 [Section 2(d) oppositions to registration of TREKGUIDE for "Barometers; Magnetic compasses; Thermometers, THERMOTREK for "electric hand warmers," and TREKCEL for "Transformers; Portable electrical power chargers for cell phones, smart phones, tablet computers, MP3 players and wireless headsets," in view of the registered mark TREK and… [read post]
21 Apr 2021, 3:39 am
[Answer will be found in the first comment.]In re Golden Coffee LLC, Application Serial No. 88577515 (April 15, 2021) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge Christen M. [read post]
17 Apr 2009, 7:14 am
While I couldn’t find the exact article by WSJ reporter Mark Maremont that launched Rite Aid’s (RAD) steady decline, I’m pretty sure it was around 10 years ago. [read post]
6 Feb 2018, 10:37 am by Rachel Sandler
With this decision, the United States Trademark Office will have to consider a variety of potential marks that would previously have been statutorily barred. [1] In re Brunetti, No. 2015-1109, 2017 U.S. [read post]
6 Feb 2015, 9:22 am
I'm not sure Auletta even believes journalism is a noble calling. [read post]
8 Aug 2022, 6:17 am
oh no, they’re on to us pic.twitter.com/ccGfI3YLXx— ari💫 (@gaypilled) August 8, 2022 NO... [read post]
20 Jul 2015, 3:15 am
Every so often, however, the marks in the crowd turn out to be savvy regulators who spot the Ace of Spades or figure out where the pea is actually hidden. [read post]
16 Jul 2009, 8:19 am
Sometimes, the marks are still functioning; sometimes they are zombie trademarks -- abandoned marks that still have brand name recognition (no, we're not talking about Rob Zombie's trademark.) [read post]
30 Jul 2015, 2:31 am
But the specimen wouldn't match the drawing.I'm not convinced that applicant was trying to register more than one mark. [read post]
26 Nov 2018, 3:27 am
I'm not giving any hints this time, so you're on your own. [read post]