Search for: "In Re Advertising & Marketing Development, Inc" Results 261 - 280 of 512
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Oct 2013, 5:00 am by Bexis
  The learned intermediary rule could be Bob Dylan (I know, we’re showing our age, here). [read post]
25 Mar 2024, 8:51 am by Jeffrey Neuburger
In re X-Mode Social, Inc., FTC No. 2123038 In re InMarket Media, LLC, FTC No. 2023088 In re Avast Limited, FTC No. 2023033 Two of the actions involved the collection of location data and the third involved the collection of browsing-related information. [read post]
13 Jan 2010, 12:49 pm by Adam Thierer
 He and Leibowitz continue: “Philosophically, we wonder if we’re moving to a post-disclosure era and what that would look like,” Mr. [read post]
8 Jan 2015, 6:00 am by Administrator
Part III focuses on developments in judicial regulation of the practice of law and, in particular, regulation relating to the post-entry competence of lawyers. [read post]
4 Oct 2007, 8:10 am
Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 509 U.S. 579 (1993), in which the Supreme Court first tried to evict "junk science," at least from the federal courts. [read post]
9 Sep 2020, 12:05 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
It expanded the handle export/re-import practice and began importing caulking knives from Taiwan. [read post]
14 Dec 2010, 6:41 am by Andrew Breidenbach
  With the Court’s denial in ­­­­­Tuck-It-Away, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Feb 2007, 3:40 pm
The first site developed, talentload.tv, serves as a promotional tool for advertisers, as well as a filter for casting reality shows on VH1 and MTV. [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 6:03 am by Stephen Albainy-Jenei
But for anyone looking to develop a reputation that matters, integrity is essential. [read post]
4 Oct 2021, 10:58 am by Rebecca Tushnet
 My presentation, galloping across a bunch of developments. [read post]
9 Mar 2024, 12:10 pm by Eric Goldman
”  [Cite to In re Zoom] Finally, the CDA does not require Stratics to distribute content over the internet. [read post]
21 Jun 2019, 7:55 am by Jeffrey Neuburger
According to the plaintiffs, by burying legitimate locksmiths listings (with actual, local physical locations) beneath so-called “scam” listings from locksmith call centers that act as lead generators for subcontractors, who may or may not be fully trained, plaintiffs’ legitimate businesses suffered market harm and were forced to pay for additional advertising. [read post]