Search for: "In Re Application Of" X""
Results 261 - 280
of 1,765
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Feb 2019, 8:22 am
Attorneys Daniel Bress, Daniel Collins, and Kenneth Lee, were all re-nominated. [read post]
2 Feb 2018, 2:52 am
In a previous posting by Darren Olivier here, the decision of the American Supreme Court in In re Tam, case 2014-1203 was discussed. [read post]
6 Aug 2016, 1:37 pm
Re X may be persuasive, given that it is a judgment of The Boss, but it isn’t binding. [read post]
3 Mar 2021, 10:49 am
There are a lot of reasons why your application may be denied. [read post]
26 Jan 2010, 9:01 pm
So, for example, if you're in OpenOffice working on a document and want to open Mail, you would press Command - . [read post]
5 Jan 2023, 7:21 pm
Whenever you apply for health insurance, the application asks for your gender/sex, and every application only has male/female options. [read post]
2 Jul 2012, 7:35 pm
Instead, this case involves the application of the homestead exemption from forced sale as set forth in article X, section 4(a)(1), to satisfy the appellee creditors' claims. [read post]
19 Dec 2012, 2:21 pm
This first re-run was published originally on January 30, 2012. [read post]
20 Mar 2007, 6:51 pm
A request was made by email to cap the fee at no more than X dollars (about 6 hours of time at the lawyer's hourly rate). [read post]
17 Jul 2011, 8:28 am
Thus, I read In re Sinex as saying that 20% more than X is outside the scope of substantially X. [read post]
13 Feb 2009, 8:00 am
(IP Think Tank) (The IP ADR Blog) (Chicago Intellectual Property Law Blog) 50 years of scientific discovery and sharing in Antarctica may end thanks to patent greed (Techdirt) Take steps to limit the impact of licensee’s economic woes (Technology Transfer Tactics) Australia TMO delegate allows ‘ElvisFinance’ covering financial services to proceed to registration despite opposition: Elvis Presley Enterprises Inc v Elvis Jelcic (Australian Trade Marks Law Blog)… [read post]
19 Jun 2022, 1:13 pm
The case concerned an application for a management transfer following threats of domestic abuse made to the Claimant, TRX, by X, her former partner. [read post]
21 Mar 2016, 4:00 am
We’re not saying that’s the case with Apple, but if the burden is not the guiding inquiry under the All Writs Act, that would suggest that the burden can be irrelevant in cases in which the necessity is sufficiently clear. [read post]
21 Jun 2012, 8:01 am
Clemens, you’re free to go. [read post]
23 Sep 2014, 6:49 am
The Mini Bath Scale measurements are – 9” wide x 5” high x 0.8” deep – expands to 7” high when display is pulled out. [read post]
7 Mar 2014, 8:00 am
If we use their salaries as a basis for measuring productivity and we assume a 10% erosion in motivation due to the conflict, we obtain:6 x $45,000 x 20% (10 weeks/52 weeks) x 10% = $5,400Already we’re at $90,000 for this single, ten week conflict between two managers. [read post]
10 Sep 2023, 4:00 am
X a heurté mortellement la victime. [read post]
4 Feb 2011, 8:25 am
A keen reader has written to ask the Kats whether they are aware of any discussion on the question whether parallel imports of goods marked X, into a country Y where the owner of brand X does not itself trade, constitutes a genuine use as a defence to an application for revocation in country Y? [read post]
8 Jun 2011, 10:00 pm
The secretary of state did not, therefore, owe the claimant a common duty of care to consider and deal with his re-submitted application for a visa within a reasonable time. [read post]
4 Jun 2015, 11:40 am
$210/week x 4.3 weeks/month = $903/month, minus ($684 + $15) = $204/month. [read post]
