Search for: "In Re Application of Smith" Results 261 - 280 of 2,110
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Oct 2021, 1:52 pm by Jason Rantanen
(Duffy.BPAI.pdf) Joseph Casino and Michael Kasdan, In re Seagate Technology: Willfulness and Waiver, a Summary and a Proposal, 2007 Patently-O Patent L.J. 1 (Casino-Seagate)   [read post]
4 Oct 2021, 1:52 pm by Jason Rantanen
(Duffy.BPAI.pdf) Joseph Casino and Michael Kasdan, In re Seagate Technology: Willfulness and Waiver, a Summary and a Proposal, 2007 Patently-O Patent L.J. 1 (Casino-Seagate)   [read post]
30 Sep 2021, 3:45 am
"] October 26, 2021 - 1 PM: In re James Todd Smith, Serial No. 88595239 [Refusal to register THE INFLUENCE OF HIP HOP for "Radio communications; radio broadcasting information; mobile radio communication" because "the specimen of use does not show use of the mark in connection with the services identified in the application.] [read post]
29 Sep 2021, 10:37 am by Tim Hewson
It is then a public document that anybody can submit an application to view. [read post]
20 Sep 2021, 5:00 am by SHG
There are plenty of Johns and Debbies around, and some are Smiths and Jones for real, not just aliases. [read post]
30 Aug 2021, 8:46 am by Bryce Klehm, Rohini Kurup
Adam Smith, chair of the House Armed Services Committee, about the 2022 National Defense Authorization Act. [read post]
26 Aug 2021, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
  My gratitude extends to others (very much including Smith, Zambrano, Tyler, Grove, and Walsh) whose work has taught me so much and whose comments [read post]
24 Aug 2021, 6:34 am by Chris Castle
So when Spotify tell you (and the UK Parliament) that they can’t pay a fair royalty because they’re struggling so much, here’s more evidence that those claims really are as much bunk as they sound like. [read post]
15 Aug 2021, 9:30 pm by Public Employment Law Press
” In 1900 this "rule of one" as then set out in then Civil Service Law §14 was struck down by the Court of Appeals as unconstitutional.In People v Mosher, 163 NY 32, the Court of Appeals held that "if the civil service commissioners have power to certify to the appointing officer only one applicant of several who are eligible and whom they have, by their own methods, ascertained to be fitted for a particular position, and their decision is final ... then the civil… [read post]
15 Aug 2021, 9:30 pm by Public Employment Law Press
” In 1900 this "rule of one" as then set out in then Civil Service Law §14 was struck down by the Court of Appeals as unconstitutional.In People v Mosher, 163 NY 32, the Court of Appeals held that "if the civil service commissioners have power to certify to the appointing officer only one applicant of several who are eligible and whom they have, by their own methods, ascertained to be fitted for a particular position, and their decision is final ... then the civil… [read post]
Before taking any material workplace action with respect to the vaccine, therefore, please consult with a Reed Smith employment lawyer. [read post]
4 Aug 2021, 9:17 pm by Chuck Cosson
And if you cut them down, and you're just the man to do it, do you really think you could stand upright in the winds that would blow then? [read post]
We recommend employers who utilize non-competes stay abreast of applicable state laws, which are ever evolving. [read post]
29 Jun 2021, 4:09 pm by INFORRM
When he announced the Online Harms White Paper in April 2019 the then Culture Secretary, Jeremy Wright QC, was at pains to reassure the press that the proposed regulatory regime would not impinge on press freedom. [read post]