Search for: "In Re Loring"
Results 261 - 280
of 341
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Jun 2008, 4:51 pm
Po, the panda with unlikely martial arts aspirations, has made it inside a temple storing a variety of legendary weapons and other hallowed items suffused with kung fu lore. [read post]
9 May 2008, 12:53 am
It's not clear whether the article refers to Loring's declaration in the ill-fated FTCR re-exam of the WARF patents, or to some other effort. [read post]
24 Apr 2008, 5:31 am
And why should it be more--far more--than a perfunctory conflicts and credit check and we're done here? [read post]
18 Apr 2008, 2:22 pm
" For example, his poorly thoughtout re-examination challenge of the WARF patents, cost California taxpayers (and others) a lot of money. [read post]
17 Apr 2008, 1:17 pm
We get press credentials...we’re a real publication, and we’re treated as journalists. [read post]
15 Apr 2008, 3:30 pm
If you use a blog and you think of it as developing a community, what you’re really doing is you’re extending your network...you’re able to touch more and more people, literally sitting at your desk in front of your computer. [read post]
15 Apr 2008, 10:13 am
McDonald (In re World Health Alternatives, Inc.), 2008 WL 1002035 (Bankr. [read post]
11 Apr 2008, 4:12 pm
Not that U.S. firms weren't doing the same, but we're Canadians... sometimes we're just (too) quiet about our innovation. [read post]
10 Apr 2008, 5:41 pm
We're really at a turning point for social media, and the fun is only just beginning. [read post]
8 Apr 2008, 4:30 pm
So, if you're a lawyer and you want to be found on Google, it makes total sense to regularly update a blog and teach people about your field. 2. [read post]
6 Apr 2008, 11:01 pm
In re Translogic Tech., Inc., 504 F.3d 1249, 1257 (Fed. [read post]
5 Apr 2008, 1:38 pm
Maybe they’re just trying to snare a husband and don’t see a longterm future for themselves in the law but I know I wouldn’t take them to a client meeting looking like that. [read post]
31 Mar 2008, 4:01 pm
Pour a load of water on the top, and you're done. [read post]
30 Mar 2008, 12:23 am
One recalls that the ill-fated re-examination effort of PubPat and FTCR (now re-named "Consumer Watchdog") on the WARF patents fell apart on the conclusory nature of statements by Loring and Trounson. [read post]
28 Mar 2008, 4:56 pm
In In re New Motor Vehicles Canadian Export Antitrust Litig., No. 07-2257 (1st Cir. [read post]
19 Mar 2008, 10:57 pm
The declarations (by Loring and others) were found by the USPTO to be conclusionary. [read post]
13 Mar 2008, 3:03 am
Constance Holden of ScienceToday reported of the recent WARF victories over FTCR and PubPat in the re-examination of stem cell patents:Opponents are looking to the next fight. [read post]
9 Mar 2008, 11:14 am
” Winnipeg Free Press *** John Bolch, author of Family Lore, has done a very detailed review of the leading Family Law blogs - a useful overview. [read post]
5 Mar 2008, 10:34 pm
Feeling in a generous mood, I thought I would again respond to some of the search queries that have recently found their way to Family Lore. [read post]
4 Mar 2008, 5:25 am
The State justified admission of this evidence as proof of res gestae, knowledge of the layout of the store, motive, and identity. [read post]
