Search for: "In Re Loring"
Results 261 - 280
of 335
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Apr 2008, 4:12 pm
Not that U.S. firms weren't doing the same, but we're Canadians... sometimes we're just (too) quiet about our innovation. [read post]
10 Apr 2008, 5:41 pm
We're really at a turning point for social media, and the fun is only just beginning. [read post]
8 Apr 2008, 4:30 pm
So, if you're a lawyer and you want to be found on Google, it makes total sense to regularly update a blog and teach people about your field. 2. [read post]
6 Apr 2008, 11:01 pm
In re Translogic Tech., Inc., 504 F.3d 1249, 1257 (Fed. [read post]
5 Apr 2008, 1:38 pm
Maybe they’re just trying to snare a husband and don’t see a longterm future for themselves in the law but I know I wouldn’t take them to a client meeting looking like that. [read post]
31 Mar 2008, 4:01 pm
Pour a load of water on the top, and you're done. [read post]
30 Mar 2008, 12:23 am
One recalls that the ill-fated re-examination effort of PubPat and FTCR (now re-named "Consumer Watchdog") on the WARF patents fell apart on the conclusory nature of statements by Loring and Trounson. [read post]
28 Mar 2008, 4:56 pm
In In re New Motor Vehicles Canadian Export Antitrust Litig., No. 07-2257 (1st Cir. [read post]
19 Mar 2008, 10:57 pm
The declarations (by Loring and others) were found by the USPTO to be conclusionary. [read post]
13 Mar 2008, 3:03 am
Constance Holden of ScienceToday reported of the recent WARF victories over FTCR and PubPat in the re-examination of stem cell patents:Opponents are looking to the next fight. [read post]
9 Mar 2008, 11:14 am
” Winnipeg Free Press *** John Bolch, author of Family Lore, has done a very detailed review of the leading Family Law blogs - a useful overview. [read post]
5 Mar 2008, 10:34 pm
Feeling in a generous mood, I thought I would again respond to some of the search queries that have recently found their way to Family Lore. [read post]
4 Mar 2008, 5:25 am
The State justified admission of this evidence as proof of res gestae, knowledge of the layout of the store, motive, and identity. [read post]
4 Mar 2008, 5:25 am
The State justified admission of this evidence as proof of res gestae, knowledge of the layout of the store, motive, and identity. [read post]
3 Mar 2008, 12:39 pm
Loring. [read post]
2 Mar 2008, 7:16 am
Loring and Trounson can't have it both ways. [read post]
28 Feb 2008, 11:40 pm
The declarations of Trounson, Loring, and Melton (which have relevance ONLY to the inter partes proceeding as to US 7,209,913) had no impact on the USPTO decision. [read post]
28 Feb 2008, 8:19 am
Pats. 5,843,780 and 6,200,806), which are still pending.IPBiz notes that this was the "inter partes" re-exam, wherein declarations were made by Trounson (now head of CIRM) and Loring [among others]. [read post]
19 Feb 2008, 4:18 pm
Primarily we’re talking about documents from jurisdictions without ’strong’ protection of freedom of expression or freedom of the press. [read post]
17 Jan 2008, 1:18 am
If the mother does move, the father will still have a right to contact with the children, although obviously the terms of the contact will probably have to be re-negotiated, or varied by the court. [read post]
