Search for: "In Re Medical Review Panel" Results 261 - 280 of 893
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Apr 2016, 11:09 am by Arfaa Law Group
The arbitration panel reviewed the facts of the case and ruled in favor of the plaintiff, awarding her $25,000 in non-economic damages and over $3,000 in arbitration expenses. [read post]
28 Jun 2008, 2:46 pm
A number of physicians speaking to the panel urged further study, but said medical information gathered through use of the contrast agents outweighed their side effects. [read post]
8 Sep 2017, 3:48 am by Lyle Denniston
  The panel added: “Refugees have only a narrow window of time to complete their travel, as certain security and medical checks expire and must then be re-initiated. [read post]
4 Mar 2013, 11:38 am
On February 6 of this year, a unanimous three-judge panel of the California Court of Appeals in Los Angeles upheld that decision. [read post]
4 Aug 2011, 8:02 am by Steve Hall
It just can't review evidence that was tested or introduced into evidence before then. [read post]
14 May 2012, 7:22 am by Rebecca Shafer, J.D.
 They’re often difficult to influence (not unlike physicians)! [read post]
6 Jul 2010, 4:58 am by Sean Wajert
  In re: Welding Fume Products Liability Litigation, MDL No. 1535 (N.D. [read post]
4 Jan 2023, 9:17 am by Peyton
Attorneys experienced and familiar with the procedures can help you prepare a complaint with the Indiana Department of Insurance, present your claim to the medical review panel, and prepare your lawsuit. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 5:17 pm by Robert J. McKennon
  In addition, they would require prior approval of health insurance rates and create a new independent review panel. [read post]
6 Sep 2017, 9:27 am by Jon Gelman
Regarding adjournment requests for independent medical exams (IMEs), again, the current Rule should be enforced, and judges should adjourn cases accordingly, so as not to re-list matters before they are ready, or delay them from being adjudicated in a timely manner. [read post]
27 Mar 2009, 7:20 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Think Tank Global Week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com]   Highlights this week included: US CAFC: Continuation limits invalid; limits on claims and RCEs are ok: Tafas v Doll (Patently-O) (Law360) (Hal Wegner) (IAM) (Patent Baristas) (Promote the Progress) (Patent Docs) (Patent Docs) (Patent Docs) (IP Spotlight) (Inventive Step) (IP Watchdog) (Washington State Patent Law Blog) (Anticipate This!) [read post]
21 Nov 2010, 7:51 pm by pgbarnes
Morrissey, who had suffered from serious depression for which he had taken medication, felt he was being pushed aside, say those close to the magazine. [read post]