Search for: "In Re Petition of Doe"
Results 261 - 280
of 7,718
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Jun 2009, 11:00 pm
If I as a law librarian sometimes feel confused using PACER, what chance does a pro se patron have of confidently using the system? [read post]
18 May 2012, 6:57 pm
In re Prudential Ins. [read post]
5 Nov 2007, 7:45 am
(In re K.H. [read post]
11 Sep 2007, 2:16 am
As noted in his email distribution list, the decision in In re Milton, 2006 WL 4559500 (Com'r dec. 2006)(Pearson, Dir., Off. of Petitions) held:"The decision on the original decision dismissed Petitioner's request to withdraw the holding of abandonment, on the grounds that Petitioner's reliance on an oral promise is expressly prohibited by 37 C.F.R. [read post]
2 Jan 2019, 6:39 am
Finally, Amicus in support of Father does nothing to educate this Court. [read post]
15 May 2010, 10:52 am
If however, you’re filing the petition in a state that does use the Means Test in they’re analysis of the case, or if you file most of your cases in a jurisdiciton that lives and breathes by the Means Test, it’s a VERY big deal, especially for cases that are borderline on whether they can file a Chapter 7 or not. [read post]
17 Mar 2010, 10:35 am
Thus, Magwood’s failure to raise his due process claim earlier does not render his current petition successive. [read post]
3 Sep 2011, 8:14 am
In re Application of Lozano, 2011 WL 3667444 (S.D.N.Y.) the case involved a dispute between Manuel Jose Lozano ("Petitioner") and Diana Lucia Montoya Alvarez ("Respondent"), regarding their five-year-old child. [read post]
23 Feb 2013, 1:47 pm
Not in the case of In re: Kim St. [read post]
9 Oct 2014, 2:50 pm
They're just saying that a method of operation [which copyright does not extend to] should be looked at at a more abstract level. [read post]
20 Mar 2024, 6:16 am
Normally, people don't get damages in Article 78 petitions; they get an injunction or a definitive court ruling on some issue involving public administration.At the same time, under res judicata principles, you cannot relitigate the same issues over and over in different courts. [read post]
31 May 2022, 6:25 pm
But it does happen with some frequency. [read post]
21 Mar 2014, 2:32 pm
In re Lawrence, 237 B.R. 61 (D. [read post]
12 Aug 2015, 12:00 pm
The post What Does the Trademark Registration Say? [read post]
19 Apr 2009, 4:31 am
In re Electronic Database Litigation, 509 F.3d 116 (2d Cir. 2007) cert. granted March 2, 2009.Does 17 U.S.C. [read post]
5 Sep 2013, 6:05 am
In In re Hood, No. 12-15925, 2013 US App. [read post]
9 Oct 2019, 4:07 pm
Filing Your Petition You will file your petition with the court. [read post]
6 Oct 2015, 9:11 am
On October 14, 2015, the Supreme Court of Ohio will hear oral argument in the case of In re: Daren A. [read post]
17 Apr 2017, 9:07 pm
The organization would like to see COOL reimposed, suggesting it could be re-instated by an executive order by President Trump. [read post]
7 Mar 2007, 12:14 am
Judge Williamson of the Middle District of Florida issued his decision in the case of In re Buonopane, ___ B.R. ____, 2007 WL 247888 (Bkrtcy. [read post]
