Search for: "In Re Standing Order With Reasons Regarding Objections"
Results 261 - 280
of 1,200
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Jan 2021, 8:47 am
The district court’s order is attached. [read post]
4 Jan 2021, 1:26 pm
The details regarding the 2020 filings, summarized below, are examined in my recent annual federal court securities class action filings report, here. [read post]
30 Dec 2020, 4:27 pm
State Water Res. [read post]
22 Dec 2020, 8:34 am
She agreed with the majority that the instruction regarding the garden hoe was error warranting a new trial. [read post]
9 Dec 2020, 7:15 am
If no objection is raised, no hearing is required for confirmation. [read post]
2 Dec 2020, 2:45 am
” A reasonable question but, in a white-collar prosecution, the wrong one. [read post]
24 Nov 2020, 12:18 pm
Under this rule, we’re told to do both?! [read post]
22 Nov 2020, 5:43 pm
He again informs E/C that the reason for the medical treatment is work related. [read post]
18 Nov 2020, 8:31 am
This doesn't prevent it from offering the insurance via Mirrlees' labor income tax (which ignores both investment and saving, and hence capital income, since it is a one-period model), but the government has to address moral hazard by including a significant co-pay (i.e., 1 minus the marginal tax rate).Principal-agent in the workplace - If you're self-employed and have some sort of a business, then you're at full risk, the tax system et al aside, with… [read post]
13 Nov 2020, 4:32 am
The reason may be a disagreement about the nature of inseverability. [read post]
5 Nov 2020, 11:54 am
There was some dispute about whether the First Amendment analysis would differ with regard to those two different statuses. [read post]
4 Nov 2020, 7:04 am
And you took detailed notes regarding indicators of impairment in this particular case, did you not? [read post]
29 Oct 2020, 3:09 am
You know, I’ve heard very mixed reactions regarding the coaching of witnesses online. [read post]
24 Oct 2020, 3:42 pm
Finally, to the extent “Christian” is seen to stand for beliefs that are judgmental, primitive, exclusionary or anti-scientific, I sadly understand why some would hold that perspective. [read post]
21 Oct 2020, 5:37 pm
He didn’t argue that the reporting requirement was unconstitutional or provide any reason for his non-compliance. [read post]
19 Oct 2020, 10:28 am
We’re a small and flexible team where everyone does a little bit of everything, but your primary job on a daily basis will be conducting research and policy advocacy at the intersection of technology, data protection, and equity. [read post]
15 Oct 2020, 7:26 am
(C-623/17 [78], [80], [81]) - The objective of safeguarding national security is capable of justifying measures entailing more serious interferences with fundamental rights than might be justified by the other objectives set out in Article 15(1) of the ePrivacy Directive. [read post]
8 Oct 2020, 10:20 am
The trial court also reminded the jury that the reasonable doubt standard applied to all parts of the trial and re-instructed the jury on the burden of proof, the presumption of innocence, and reasonable doubt. [read post]
6 Oct 2020, 3:00 am
(2) Does the Federal Power Act preempt state court challenges to an environmental impact report prepared under the California Environmental Quality Act in order to comply with the federal water quality certification under the federal Clean Water Act? [read post]
5 Oct 2020, 8:17 am
” Second, subpoenas may be “no broader than reasonably necessary to support Congress’s legislative objective. [read post]
