Search for: "In Re Watts"
Results 261 - 280
of 610
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Mar 2016, 8:11 am
They can use “fixed”-type TVWS on moving machinery in order to benefit from the higher permitted power levels (but only up to four watts), so long as the device re-registers with the TVWS database whenever it moves 50 meters after its last registration. [read post]
12 Mar 2016, 11:50 am
The amended order also provided:`Respondent David shall immediately cease and desist from sending any text messages, e[-]mails, posting any tweets (including the re-tweeting or forwarding), posting any images or other forms of communication directed at John Textor without a legitimate purpose. [read post]
11 Mar 2016, 7:55 am
Odd if we’re trying to provide a reward for inventors. [read post]
9 Mar 2016, 12:17 pm
“Right now we’re at an impasse — we can’t find the plane, and all the previous estimates and searching hasn’t had much of a result. [read post]
3 Mar 2016, 5:19 am
” Watts v. [read post]
28 Feb 2016, 5:00 am
Watts, 2016 U.S. [read post]
19 Feb 2016, 11:57 am
Corporation with no in-state assets, employees, or registered agent, cannot be at home.In re Roman Catholic Diocese of Albany, New York, Inc., 745 F.3d 30 (2d Cir. [read post]
14 Feb 2016, 6:25 pm
As was stated in Re P(DM) v. [read post]
10 Feb 2016, 9:00 am
Questions should be addressed to Erin Watt at ewatt@abfn.org. [read post]
5 Feb 2016, 7:53 am
The case is Watts v. [read post]
31 Jan 2016, 10:07 am
Watts, Jr., a former Republican congressman, sent its report to Congress, the President and the Justice Department. [read post]
21 Jan 2016, 12:50 pm
” Id.We’re pleased that the latest threat to the LID has gone by the boards. [read post]
21 Jan 2016, 12:08 pm
We’re pleased that the latest threat to the LID has gone by the boards. [read post]
21 Jan 2016, 12:08 pm
We’re pleased that the latest threat to the LID has gone by the boards. [read post]
31 Dec 2015, 5:12 am
Full disclosure: Reed Smith is involved in Caplinger, so consider this entry a non-RS post.In re Celexa & Lexapro Marketing & Sales Practices Litigation, 779 F.3d 34 (1st Cir. 2015). [read post]
24 Dec 2015, 8:20 am
At least that was the margin until Watts. [read post]
31 Oct 2015, 2:39 pm
When the Supreme Court of Canada says “X” in 2007, and repeats “X” in 2011 adding explicitly that “X does not mean Y but means Z”, it is reasonable to assume (is it not?) [read post]
29 Sep 2015, 10:42 am
In re Driven Innovations, Inc. [read post]
29 Sep 2015, 10:42 am
In re Driven Innovations, Inc. [read post]
8 Sep 2015, 4:22 am
In Re TriStar History and Preservation Inc., Serial Nos. 86078454 and 86111943 (September 3, 2015) [not precedential]. [read post]
