Search for: "In re: AT&T Intellectual Property II"
Results 261 - 280
of 573
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 May 2008, 1:35 pm
I'm not an intellectual property lawyer, so I'll leave for someone else to figure out the merit of the claims arising under IP rights. [read post]
21 Dec 2015, 6:21 am
They don’t want to see counterfeit goods, for example. [read post]
29 Feb 2012, 7:43 am
IPKat team member Jeremy, in his capacity as editor of the Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, lets off a bit of steam on the jiplp weblog concerning the use of a phrase that does not enjoy his approval. [read post]
6 Jul 2015, 12:36 pm
The first of these is GO Outdoors Ltd v Skechers USA Inc II [2015] EWHC 1405 (Ch), a 19 May decision of Mrs Justice Rose, sitting in the Chancery Division, England and Wales, on an appeal from a decision of the UK Intellectual Property Office. [read post]
13 Jul 2015, 3:51 am
"3D printing has stagnated", and the fault is of intellectual property law, says designer Francis Bitonti. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 12:29 am
Remember Crazy Frog.While the IPKat is a great admirer of the Intellectual Property Office in the UK, he is also a great believer -- particularly after years of dealing with lawyers and students doing exams -- that questions should be answered as clearly and directly as possible. [read post]
21 Mar 2017, 3:20 am
These pre-loaded set-top boxes pose such challenges to legal content distribution that the UK Intellectual Property Office is studying whether its laws need upgrading to deal with this new form of unauthorized content distribution. [read post]
15 Jul 2019, 1:58 pm
If a professional representative is appointed, the duty of all due care applies both to the applicants themselves and their professional representatives (J 5/80, OJ EPO 1981, 343, reasons 4; J 3/08, reasons 4; T 742/11, reasons 3; T 2274/11, reasons 3). [read post]
2 Feb 2015, 2:56 pm
The brief is on behalf of 27 intellectual property law and constitutional law professors: Jack Balkin (Yale Law School) Barton Beebe (NYU School of Law) Stacey L. [read post]
3 Jun 2012, 6:22 am
Scope Really Really Matters, Part II. [read post]
30 Mar 2009, 6:48 pm
The Enforcement of Intellectual Property Rights chapter has four sections: civil enforcement, border measures, criminal enforcement, and the Internet. [read post]
21 Oct 2009, 2:49 pm
One must differentiate among the various forms of intellectual property (IP) law potentially applicable here. [read post]
31 May 2010, 1:27 am
If you're fed up having to shout over loud music, or pleased you don't have to say anything because you know you won't be able to make yourself heard, this poll is for you! [read post]
30 Mar 2013, 1:34 am
I wish to thank all those who already knew before that whatever I say, I say out of honest conviction and based on very hard work in terms of granular monitoring and research.Procedural context and parties' proposals for how to proceed from hereSamsung made the statement confirming a potentially higher damages award in a reply brief (which it filed late on Friday and which I've uploaded to Scribd) reinforcing its arguments for a partial final judgment and a stay pending appeal of that partial… [read post]
30 Sep 2011, 7:19 am
We praise the successful and treat them like mini-gods, allowing the CEO to benefit from the intellectual property developments of a genius in their lab who gets almost nothing. [read post]
7 Jul 2015, 4:52 pm
Mike Masnick is the founder and editor of the Techdirt blog, covering a variety of topics around innovation, intellectual property, economics, business and policy. [read post]
18 Apr 2017, 1:45 am
The international application entered the European phase on 20 March 2012.II. [read post]
1 Mar 2012, 6:57 am
Given the wide range of intellectual property functions exercised by the Controller, should that office be renamed, and what should the powers of that office be? [read post]
12 Apr 2018, 9:36 am
Ardy, Lauren Wertheimer, and Shaia Araghi), UCI Intellectual Property, Arts, and Technology Clinic: The CO has already made presumptive determinations to renew the existing exemption. [read post]
27 Sep 2010, 1:13 am
The OHIM Opposition Division dismissed the opposition on the basis that the marks simply weren't similar -- which indeed they're not (see earlier post here). [read post]
