Search for: "In re: AT&T Intellectual Property II" Results 261 - 280 of 573
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Nov 2013, 4:21 am by Walter Olson
[WLF] Re: copyright terms, US government shouldn’t endorse view that longer always means better [Simon Lester, Cato] Legal tiff over use of hotel carpet patterns in costumes [Io9] Tweet Tags: copyright, Google, patent trolls, publishers, trademarksIntellectual property roundup is a post from Overlawyered - Chronicling the high cost of our legal system [read post]
9 Nov 2013, 9:07 am by Veronika Gaertner
The note concludes with an outlook on pending cases concerning infringements of intellectual property rights. [read post]
27 Aug 2013, 6:02 am by Susan McLean
The potential consequences for breaching the FCA Promotion Rules include: (a) criminal penalties; (ii) agreements entered into as a result of the promotion being unenforceable and compensation payable; and/or (iii) the promotion being banned. [read post]
27 Aug 2013, 12:00 am
Whether it’s advocating for sensible intellectual property law that more aptly reflects the needs of a digitized citizenry, or taking up a cause he now carries close to his heart — removing the corrupting influence of money from American politics — Lessig finds a pathway to progress. [read post]
26 Aug 2013, 11:51 am by Florian Mueller
Moreover, even if it were proper, Ericsson’s post-discovery request that the ITC now set a royalty between the private parties as part of the Investigation comes far too late and would requi re significantly different evid ence and trial presentation. [read post]
8 Aug 2013, 9:36 am by Rebecca Tushnet
A: they’re happy for it to remain illegal. [read post]
11 May 2013, 5:29 pm
Joaquín Almunia, Commission Vice President in charge of competition policy, stated that '[t]he protection of intellectual property is a cornerstone of innovation and growth. [read post]
29 Apr 2013, 1:46 pm by Florian Mueller
I guess that's because she's very committed to accuracy and she recognized her error with respect to the Galaxy S II AT&T; she declined to find an error with respect to the Infuse 4G. [read post]
8 Apr 2013, 6:47 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Panel II: Critical Legal Activism & Netroots Movements Brett Frischmann, Professor of Law and Director of the Intellectual Property and Information Law Program, Benjamin N. [read post]
3 Apr 2013, 1:13 pm
On the other hand, Médecins Sans Frontières noted that '[t]he Supreme Court's decision now makes patents on the medicines that we desperately need less likely. [read post]
30 Mar 2013, 1:34 am by Florian Mueller
I wish to thank all those who already knew before that whatever I say, I say out of honest conviction and based on very hard work in terms of granular monitoring and research.Procedural context and parties' proposals for how to proceed from hereSamsung made the statement confirming a potentially higher damages award in a reply brief (which it filed late on Friday and which I've uploaded to Scribd) reinforcing its arguments for a partial final judgment and a stay pending appeal of that partial… [read post]
26 Mar 2013, 1:09 pm by Florian Mueller
So I would agree with Apple that what Judge Koh considered to be an aggressive notice date doesn't matter with respect to the Galaxy S II AT&T. [read post]
13 Mar 2013, 5:43 am
Understandably, this is generating resistance—particularly to U.S. demands for extra investor and intellectual property protections. [read post]
12 Mar 2013, 7:21 pm
Understandably, this is generating resistance—particularly to U.S. demands for extra investor and intellectual property protections. [read post]