Search for: "In re Answers Corporation Shareholders Litigation"
Results 261 - 280
of 291
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Mar 2009, 12:20 pm
And the rights of the minor, now we’re using that in the corporate sense now. [read post]
3 Mar 2009, 12:20 pm
And the rights of the minor, now we’re using that in the corporate sense now. [read post]
23 Feb 2009, 1:47 am
Whether or not boards have received "media attention," they certainly have not escaped scrutiny, as the boards of numerous companies already have been subjected to extensive private securities class action litigation by shareholders. [read post]
16 Feb 2009, 8:33 am
Shareholders Litigation, (Del. [read post]
5 Feb 2009, 10:35 am
Whereas the officers are to answer for the management. [read post]
28 Jan 2009, 9:40 am
Stephen Harbeck, President and CEO, Securities Investor Protection Corporation. [read post]
4 Dec 2008, 2:00 pm
Pritchard suggested that corporate shareholders propose a fix for what he considers flaws in the Supreme Court's Basic v. [read post]
24 Nov 2008, 1:36 pm
Louis's answer to the petition denied that he wasted or improperly diverted corporate assets; denied that David was frozen out of corporate governance; and contended that the alleged real property transfers were for the corporation's benefit. [read post]
13 Oct 2008, 12:00 pm
Case in point: In re Seneca Investments, LLC, 2008 WL 4329230 (Del. [read post]
2 Oct 2008, 7:43 pm
Unocal’s board answered Pickens’ offer by making one of its own to all shareholders except Pickens. [read post]
8 Sep 2008, 11:30 am
The first question remains the harder one to answer. [read post]
7 Sep 2008, 2:50 pm
See In Re Lear Corp S'hlder Litig., 926 A.2d 92 (Del. [read post]
29 Aug 2008, 1:25 pm
: (IP finance), Facebook removes international access to Scrabulous, except from India: (Ars Technica), (Techdirt), Reverse engineering can resolve conflict between standardisation and competition: (Techdirt), Benefits of piracy aren’t always in the expected places: (Techdirt) Events 1-3 September: Federation of Indian Chambers of Commerce and Industry, Department of Industrial Property and Promotion, and WIPO conference on ‘Development and IP: Building synergies… [read post]
20 Aug 2008, 7:39 pm
Aug. 29, 2008) and In re Lear Corporation Shareholders Litigation, C.A. 2728-VCS (Del. [read post]
11 Jul 2008, 4:30 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: ACTA continues to be discussed and debated: (Michael Geist), (Intellectual Property Watch), (Public Knowledge), (Techdirt), (Managing Intellectual Property), (Public Knowledge), (Public Knowledge), (Public Knowledge), Apotex challenge to Acular LS patent barred by res judicata: Roche Palo Alto & Allergan v Apotex:… [read post]
20 Jun 2008, 8:07 am
: (Spicy IP), Latin America: Merck Serono signs distribution agreement with Bristol-Myers Squibb for portfolio of established pharmaceutical brands in Latin America: (IP tango), US: Biotech industry growth to slow due to funding pressures and competition from biosimilars: (Managing Intellectual Property), US: House Commerce Committee posts responses to its questions on biogenerics; not surprisingly, the views run the gamut: (FDA Law Blog), US: Biosimilar debate heats up at BIO: (Managing… [read post]
24 Apr 2008, 2:37 pm
For example, it is important to know whether the corporation is allowed to keep its books and records outside the state, whether it is required to have a corporate bank account in that state, and whether the corporation is allowed to have its principle place of business outside the state. [7] A corporate attorney most likely has the expertise to not only think of these questions, but to answer them. [read post]
19 Apr 2008, 8:50 am
Perspectives from corporate law and finance. [read post]
10 Apr 2008, 2:54 pm
In re The Bear Stearns Companies, Inc., Shareholder Litig., C.A. [read post]
3 Feb 2008, 10:20 pm
Proponents of MDPs Client demand for "one stop shopping" has driven professional services firms and hindered traditional law firms; clients want efficiency, convenience, and all their answers under one roof. [3] With an MDP, clients will no longer have to hire a law firm for litigation and legal document drafting purposes on one side of town, with an accounting firm for audits and tax advice on the other. [4] Clients will save on information and transactional costs,… [read post]
