Search for: "In re I. W." Results 261 - 280 of 7,902
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Aug 2023, 11:54 am by Russell Knight
So, I hope you can read the language of that country’s child support laws. [read post]
6 Aug 2023, 6:38 am by David Pocklington
Further: “[I]t is wholly unacceptable to seek to challenge a decision of a judge on grounds of bias (actual or apparent) simply because they do not actively condemn inappropriate action, or more generally because they follow, or may follow, a different religion from that of the applicant. [read post]
6 Aug 2023, 5:40 am by Joel R. Brandes
 August 2, 2023Appellate Division, First DepartmentAge 29 Law allows unmarried children through age 29, regardless of financial dependence, to be covered under a parent’s group health insurance policy  In B.D. [read post]
4 Aug 2023, 10:14 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Once I have a phone connected to the internet, I want my software available to me everywhere. [read post]
4 Aug 2023, 8:08 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Permits member states to require re-investment of streaming revenue locally. [read post]
3 Aug 2023, 7:09 pm by thomasgalvani
This post is about letters of protest, but in the section above, I mentioned opposition and cancellation proceedings. [read post]
3 Aug 2023, 3:11 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
When a musicologist says “I’m not saying these are copied but these similarities are really rare,” if they’re making an empirical claim, their foundation is shaky. [read post]
3 Aug 2023, 11:05 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Too much to choose from; I prioritized things that were new to me. [read post]
3 Aug 2023, 12:59 am by David Pocklington
It follows that I will not issue a faculty to provide, as the petitioners describe it, a short term fix by their disposal. [read post]
2 Aug 2023, 2:51 pm by Mark S. Goldstein and Eduardo Vargas
The ruling had an immediate impact on higher education institutions, prompting many colleges and universities to re-evaluate their admissions processes and diversity initiatives. [read post]
2 Aug 2023, 5:36 am by Scott H. Kimpel
There, that court found that, “[w]hereas … [i]nstitutional [b]uyers reasonably expected that [the defendant crypto-asset company] would use the capital it received from its sales to improve the [crypto-asset] ecosystem and thereby increase the price of [the crypto-asset],” those who purchased their coins through secondary transactions had no reasonable basis to expect the same. . . . [read post]