Search for: "In re Interest of Edward B." Results 261 - 280 of 366
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Apr 2011, 5:51 pm by INFORRM
It might be thought that this does little more than re-emphasise what is already apparent from the existing rules relating to jurisdiction. [read post]
23 Mar 2011, 5:10 pm by INFORRM
” (b)  Once the parties’ names are publicly attached to the proceedings, the Court’s ability to control that information is lost. [read post]
17 Feb 2011, 4:02 pm by INFORRM
” [35] Re-litigation abuse This is the most interesting and complex issue presented by the Defendant’s application to strike out. [read post]
29 Jan 2011, 4:19 pm by Joseph C. McDaniel
This case is interesting in that sense, and is also interesting in that it marked the death of ride-through in Arizona, which is a part of the 9th Judicial Circuit. [read post]
16 Jan 2011, 2:50 pm by Gideon
Earlier this week, a Wikileaks volunteer was detained at an American airport, attempting to re-enter the country after a vacation. [read post]
16 Jan 2011, 9:18 am by Intelligent Challenge
When working as an in-house counsel, when problems arose I was much less interested in pointing fingers, and more interested in sorting out the consequences quickly and effectively, working out how the problem arose (the framework in the book “Difficult Conversations” calls this assessing “contribution”) and then making sure we (collectively) avoided a re-run. [read post]
8 Jan 2011, 3:26 pm by Steve Bainbridge
It's a pity they didn't live in a community property state, which would have made things really interesting. [read post]
16 Dec 2010, 5:03 pm by Mike
Lenches, (9th Cir.2001) (prejudice means prejudice to a legal claim or interest, not having to incur litigation expenses); In re Arnold, (9th Cir. [read post]
30 Nov 2010, 10:25 am by WSLL
Dodson, Williams, Porter, Day & Neville, Casper, WY for Edward & Janice King; and Steven F. [read post]