Search for: "In re J. C."
Results 261 - 280
of 4,360
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 May 2023, 12:29 pm
Section 76 provides, so far as relevant: (2) Subject to section 77, a lease is a long lease if— (a) it is granted for a term of years certain exceeding 21 years, whether or not it is (or may become) terminable before the end of that term by notice given by or to the tenant, by re-entry or forfeiture or otherwise,(b) it is for a term fixed by law under a grant with a covenant or obligation for perpetual renewal (but is not a lease by sub-demise from one which is not a long… [read post]
30 May 2023, 12:29 am
Constable J rejected the argument that Groups A and B (representing the Church of England) were designed to represent faith groups while Groups C (representing teachers) and D (representing the local authority) were designed to be secular [65]. [read post]
29 May 2023, 2:40 pm
“When we perform our investigations, we’re really looking for a common source or exposure point,” she said. [read post]
29 May 2023, 9:03 am
On 26 May 2023 the managing judge, Fancourt J, handed down judgment in the case of Grant v News Group Newspapers Ltd (Re Mobile Telephone Voicemail Interception Ligitation) [2023] EWHC 1273 (Ch) The judge dismissed the Sun’s application for summary judgment in relation to illegal information gathering but allowed the application in relation to the phone hacking parts of the claim on “limitation” grounds. [read post]
28 May 2023, 3:59 am
Intitulé : Fournier c. [read post]
24 May 2023, 9:24 am
Jassin & Stephen C. [read post]
24 May 2023, 9:24 am
Jassin & Stephen C. [read post]
24 May 2023, 6:37 am
Some reimbursement payments were made from the Donald J. [read post]
23 May 2023, 12:58 am
The House of Lords Secondary Legislation Scrutiny Committee (“SLSC”) has identified a re-attempt by the Government to amend the Public Order Act 1986 to lower the threshold for police intervention in respect of protests that was already rejected in January 2023 in the Public Order Bill—now the Public Order Act 2023. [read post]
16 May 2023, 11:43 am
Harper itself adopts the approach the SCC took in Reference re Prov. [read post]
16 May 2023, 8:53 am
They're at it again! [read post]
15 May 2023, 2:51 pm
[Ex ante restrictions are back, and they're still causing trouble, now in United States v. [read post]
14 May 2023, 9:00 pm
Desperate times demand desperate measures. [read post]
12 May 2023, 3:00 am
The software was rewritten in C# and became InSPC v2 in 2017/2018. [read post]
11 May 2023, 9:07 am
C. [read post]
10 May 2023, 12:35 pm
Oklahoma / Miller, Robert J. [read post]
9 May 2023, 9:01 pm
There is reason to believe the SEC’s new universal proxy Rule 14a-19 will result in more stockholder nominees being elected to the boards of public companies. [read post]
9 May 2023, 4:51 pm
Search engines The ICO has, since Google Spain SL, Google Inc. v Agencia Espanola de Proteccion de Datos (AEPD) and Mario Costeja Gonzalez (Case C-131/12) (‘Google Spain’) considered claims from data subjects about the lawfulness of the processing of their personal data by search engines. [read post]
8 May 2023, 9:01 pm
The constitutional crisis caused by the Republicans’ attempts at extortion via the debt ceiling has now increased from a simmer to a boil. [read post]
