Search for: "In re Jonathan H."
Results 261 - 280
of 533
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Jan 2023, 8:09 am
This morning the Court also DIGged a case (as in, Dismissed as Improvidently Granted): In re Grand Jury, which concerned the extent to which attorney client privilege applies to communications containing both legal and non-legal advice. [read post]
18 Mar 2014, 6:53 pm
It’s easy the score the Senate Climate Caucus for being full of hot air — and all but two Senate Democrats for voting to roll back fiscally responsible and environmentally sound NFIP reforms — but they’re not the only ones supporting bad policy here. [read post]
9 Jun 2020, 6:06 am
They're also suffering the worst effects of Covid-19, one of many health and social implications of inequality. [read post]
15 Aug 2014, 5:00 am
§ 78u‐6(h)(1)). [read post]
13 Oct 2013, 8:13 am
(Jonathan H. [read post]
24 May 2014, 8:22 am
Everyone was required to re-apply. [read post]
20 Nov 2020, 3:44 pm
See In re Federal Bureau of Prisons' Execution Protocol Cases (In re FBOP), 955 F.3d 106 (D.C. [read post]
18 Jun 2024, 8:28 am
H. [read post]
23 Feb 2022, 10:34 am
So what they think is there may be millions of people, just across different borders, who will be here, you see, if -- a question of food stamps, and so all those people, we don't know, the record doesn't tell us whether they're in Arizona or not. [read post]
30 Jun 2020, 9:28 am
If you're like me, this case may seem a little odd, because one federal agency is suing another. [read post]
19 May 2015, 7:14 pm
The IRS’s re-write is especially problematic because it leads to further employer penalties under Section 4980H(b). [read post]
[Jonathan H. Adler] Here come Trump’s judges: President to put forward more strong judicial nominees
7 May 2017, 7:04 pm
If they were sufficiently qualified to make his Supreme Court shortlist, they’re clearly qualified for circuit courts. [read post]
27 Oct 2022, 3:37 pm
And so, he would prefer to just be called "judge": [I]f we're going to use titles and names to carry out these official duties, then "Judge" seems like the least risky option. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 6:06 am
Mann's attorney also told the NYT they still plan to appeal the prior decisions that had removed CEI and National Review from the case: "Asked about Competitive Enterprise Institute and National Review, John Williams said, 'They're next.'" * * * A post-script. [read post]
10 May 2024, 4:10 pm
Emergency filings seeking relief from extraordinary relief (such as when district courts issue national injunctions) "short circuit our process," Justice Thomas remarked, adding "The way we're doing it now is not a thorough way" of doing it. [read post]
10 Mar 2024, 12:57 pm
He has also suggested an alternative: Ditching the requirement of "injury-in-fact" while simultaneously (re)invigorating Article II limitations on private party standing to enforce federal law. [read post]
14 Apr 2015, 6:02 am
As Grewal explains, The Preamble to the regulation cites no statutory authority for re-writing Section 36B. [read post]
31 Aug 2023, 10:40 am
The bottom line is that a silver bullet to prevent the re-election of Donald Trump remains hard to find. [read post]
7 Jun 2014, 8:58 am
They’re really trying to intimidate anyone else who might want to pursue similar scholarly lines of inquiry. [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 3:00 pm
In Support of Jonathan L. [read post]
