Search for: "In re Jonathan H."
Results 261 - 280
of 533
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Jun 2015, 1:14 pm
If you look at the precedent, if you look at the traditional discretion that the executive branch possesses when it comes to applying immigration laws, I am convinced that what we’re doing is lawful, and our lawyers are convinced that what we’re doing is lawful. [read post]
8 Jun 2015, 10:17 am
Q: But you’re a plan-ahead kind of guy. [read post]
29 May 2015, 7:55 am
To my mind, that’s what freedom of expression means, and what’s the good of having a freedom you’re afraid to use? [read post]
26 May 2015, 2:08 pm
So anyone who claims that the Senate never considered withholding subsidies in recalcitrant states is either a) dishonest, or b) doesn’t know what they’re talking about. [read post]
24 May 2015, 12:30 am
"There are many, many interviews from New Books:An interview with the authors--John Bronsteen, Christopher Buccafusco, and Jonathan S. [read post]
19 May 2015, 7:14 pm
The IRS’s re-write is especially problematic because it leads to further employer penalties under Section 4980H(b). [read post]
28 Apr 2015, 2:14 pm
You’re funded by the Koch brothers. [read post]
19 Apr 2015, 12:30 am
"Also up on H-Net is a review of William C. [read post]
14 Apr 2015, 6:02 am
As Grewal explains, The Preamble to the regulation cites no statutory authority for re-writing Section 36B. [read post]
22 Mar 2015, 12:30 am
H-Net reviews Sacred Scripture, Sacred War: The Bible and the American Revolution by James P. [read post]
21 Mar 2015, 1:24 pm
As Richard Re notes over at Prawfsblawg, the Chief Justice often cites academic articles from law reviews in his opinions on the Court. [read post]
3 Mar 2015, 8:58 am
After all, we’re supposed to look at the whole text. [read post]
2 Mar 2015, 10:02 pm
., Frank H. [read post]
15 Feb 2015, 4:30 am
., 2015 ONSC 809 http://t.co/tA0y5pZnD3 -> blogged: Computer and Internet Law Weekly Updates for 2015-02-07 http://t.co/3G7uBoPVQY -> Une nouvelle loi en matière de protection de renseignements personnels aux États-Unis? [read post]
6 Feb 2015, 6:00 am
For folks interested in the raw data, my spreadsheet is available for download here: Download LawProfessorTwitterCensus3.1Published View Census of Law Professor Twitter Users Version 3.1 Census of Law Professor Twitter Users Version 3.0 (last updated 2/6/2015) Ryan Abbott DrRyanAbbott Southwestern Jonathan H. [read post]
5 Feb 2015, 4:09 pm
The winner of this year’s contest was occasional Inforrm contributor and media law blogger, Jonathan McCully. [read post]
24 Jan 2015, 5:54 am
The writer H. [read post]
8 Jan 2015, 7:44 am
” (If all you have to fear is a religious group’s fax machine, what you’re doing might not be as truth-to-power-ish as you think.) [read post]
18 Dec 2014, 6:00 am
The primary track is the “official business, or topics of discourse”—the substance of what we want to say.12 A secondary, or collateral, track refers to the act of speaking itself: “to timing, delays, re-phrasings, mistakes, repairs, intentions to speak, and the like. [read post]
18 Nov 2014, 9:51 am
And, after a really long break, we're back. [read post]
