Search for: "In re Marks"
Results 261 - 280
of 29,851
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Apr 2016, 5:38 am
” So I think we’re doing the right thing. [read post]
15 Jan 2013, 9:29 am
The Lance Armstrong Foundation has filed for 57 federal trademark registrations and owns 53 live marks. [read post]
16 Oct 2018, 3:14 am
In re United States of America Supplements, LLC, Serial No. 87737243 (September 18, 2018) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge George C. [read post]
8 Dec 2016, 3:30 am
" See In re Osterbert, 83 USPQ2d 1220, 1223 (TTAB 2007). [read post]
6 Mar 2020, 4:22 am
The application included a statement that he English translation of ‘MON FRÈRE’ in the mark is ‘MY BROTHER. [read post]
22 Dec 2014, 1:48 am
I know most of you will skip right past the company name objection bit, but on the off chance that you’re interested, here goes. [read post]
11 Nov 2013, 9:19 pm
All in all, this Kat is still quite fascinated by this case since it makes her re-think the value of design registrations ... and reconsider the practice of adding little bits and pieces to an otherwise perhaps slightly bland shape to render it registrable.See the IPKat's most recent report on a conflict between a trade mark and design here. [read post]
2 Feb 2018, 2:52 am
In a previous posting by Darren Olivier here, the decision of the American Supreme Court in In re Tam, case 2014-1203 was discussed. [read post]
ANOTHER ONE-DAY GPS Sale. I wonder if they’re marking these things down so aggressively because of …
19 Jul 2010, 6:00 am
I wonder if they’re marking these things down so aggressively because of competition from GPS-equipped smartphones? [read post]
8 Feb 2009, 7:01 pm
MARK SANFORD: We’re moving close to ‘a savior-based economy’. [read post]
26 Jun 2017, 12:30 am
The Claimant argued double identity on the basis that the differences between the device and "Design Elements" were so insignificant to the average consumer that they would go unnoticed per LTJ Diffusion.HHJ Clarke concluded that:[72] I am not satisfied that the sign complained of and the Trade Mark are identical because:(i) the words 'Design Elements' within Trade Mark, which are in my judgment the dominant elements of the mark, are graphically… [read post]
3 Feb 2013, 5:26 am
As Chris observes: "There are still a number of unknown factors, including the term for re-filing trade mark 'registrations' obtained under the former regime, and the issuance of practice directives from the Director-General of the Ethiopian Intellectual Property Office is still awaited. [read post]
12 Oct 2012, 8:36 am
Mark Spognardi Jesse Dill Arnstein & Lehr Chicago Partner Mark A. [read post]
23 Nov 2010, 6:50 am
Our firm is representing several defendants in these marking cases, so we'll be attending the proceedings during the day, but if you're in town feel free to stop by for a cup of coffee and a quick tour of the offices, which include our firm's core offices on the east side and the trial suite on the west side. [read post]
12 Feb 2019, 4:09 am
In re RPD Management, LLC, Serial No. 87573250 (February 11, 2019) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge Peter W. [read post]
30 Jul 2020, 8:35 am
Red is the tech-driven line that takes us down a new path, delivering lower cost legal advice with re-though and automated approaches The future in summary: In discussing the above slide, one point stood out for me: “taking cost out of the law” Mark and Richard Discussion on Legal Tech and Automation Mark: On your point Richard that law will not be about lawyers in the future. [read post]
1 Jul 2018, 3:41 pm
From Kaiser Health News: McClellan is director of the Margolis Center for Health Policy at Duke University, the academic position by which he’s commonly identified. [read post]
20 Aug 2018, 3:05 am
" Recently, in In re Constr. [read post]
22 Mar 2022, 8:14 am
Substantial evidence supported the Board’s finding that consumers would view the standard character mark .SUCKS as a non-source identifying part of a domain name and the Board did not err in finding that the stylized form of .SUCKS failed to create a separate commercial impression to support registration (In re Vox Populi Registry Ltd., February 2, 2022, Dyk, T.). [read post]
1 Jul 2010, 8:45 am
You're covered if nobody knows except those who are in the club. [read post]
